<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Brittle Hum of the Republic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bernielatham.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bernielatham.com</link>
	<description>American politics.  This is bat country.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Derbyshire on Rush and talk radio (highly recommended) by tjmkwtahnz</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/03/01/john-derbyshire-on-rush-and-talk-radio/#comment-1059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tjmkwtahnz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=4584#comment-1059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[8cwwUK  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ilsdkgtyqrky.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ilsdkgtyqrky&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8cwwUK  <a href="http://ilsdkgtyqrky.com/" rel="nofollow">ilsdkgtyqrky</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rush Limbaugh, Clear Channel, propaganda and economic reality by Daisy</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/05/05/rush-limbaugh-clear-channel-propaganda-and-economic-reality/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daisy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=6446#comment-1054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It\&#039;s good to get a fresh way of looinkg at it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It\&#8217;s good to get a fresh way of looinkg at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Refreshing sanity by Joan</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/04/01/refreshing-sanity/#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 20:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=5799#comment-1053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That iisnhgt&#039;s just what I&#039;ve been looking for. Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That iisnhgt&#8217;s just what I&#8217;ve been looking for. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Feathered thing by Lea</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2010/09/30/what-good-humans-spend-their-time-doing/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=7244#comment-985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw this at the tail end of a PBS pgm.  Went and got the dvd from the library.  Wonderful!   There is a short series of these creations.  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toXNVbvFXyk]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this at the tail end of a PBS pgm.  Went and got the dvd from the library.  Wonderful!   There is a short series of these creations.<br />
<span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://bernielatham.com/2010/09/30/what-good-humans-spend-their-time-doing/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/toXNVbvFXyk/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Without Feathers by Luluwrites</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2010/09/26/without-feathers/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luluwrites]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 02:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=7234#comment-975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome back Bernie.  I don&#039;t know what made me check in on you today, but I am glad I did.
I probably won&#039;t express this well, and it isn&#039;t an opinion based on vast amounts of research - actually it is based on none - but I&#039;ve wondered over the last few years if this is what Democracy is supposed to look like at 230+ years old?  Is it an experiment that has run it&#039;s course or met it&#039;s anticipated expiration date?  Is there nothing to fix?  I wonder if it would not be a better use of time to try and come up with something new, rather than trying to fix something that may be irreparably broken.  I hope I am wrong, but from my perspective the signs aren&#039;t good.
Or, is it simply that capitalism (or greed) and Democracy cannot mix.  Have we just ignored the whole &quot;oil and water&quot; effect the two have on each other, until the mess exploded?
I also look around and see the O&#039;Donnells, the Pauls the Palins and feel like I am totally out of the loop.  Like I miss a meeting or a secret message.  Is their god really talking to them?  And if he is, what the hell kind of a &quot;god&quot; can he be?  Are we seriously considering allowing these nitwits to govern us?
I&#039;ve never been a paranoid person.  I never pay enough attention to my surroundings to become paranoid.  I&#039;ve never been accused of being a pessimist either.  I tend to think anything can be done, if I (or if others)  just try hard enough.  But I am beginning to feel my limitations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back Bernie.  I don&#8217;t know what made me check in on you today, but I am glad I did.<br />
I probably won&#8217;t express this well, and it isn&#8217;t an opinion based on vast amounts of research &#8211; actually it is based on none &#8211; but I&#8217;ve wondered over the last few years if this is what Democracy is supposed to look like at 230+ years old?  Is it an experiment that has run it&#8217;s course or met it&#8217;s anticipated expiration date?  Is there nothing to fix?  I wonder if it would not be a better use of time to try and come up with something new, rather than trying to fix something that may be irreparably broken.  I hope I am wrong, but from my perspective the signs aren&#8217;t good.<br />
Or, is it simply that capitalism (or greed) and Democracy cannot mix.  Have we just ignored the whole &#8220;oil and water&#8221; effect the two have on each other, until the mess exploded?<br />
I also look around and see the O&#8217;Donnells, the Pauls the Palins and feel like I am totally out of the loop.  Like I miss a meeting or a secret message.  Is their god really talking to them?  And if he is, what the hell kind of a &#8220;god&#8221; can he be?  Are we seriously considering allowing these nitwits to govern us?<br />
I&#8217;ve never been a paranoid person.  I never pay enough attention to my surroundings to become paranoid.  I&#8217;ve never been accused of being a pessimist either.  I tend to think anything can be done, if I (or if others)  just try hard enough.  But I am beginning to feel my limitations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on As folks are noting, the ratings for Glenn Beck&#8217;s show at Fox are topping all but O&#8217;Reilly by The Glenn Beck Review</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/03/17/as-folks-are-noting-the-ratings-for-glenn-becks-show-at-fox-are-topping-all-but-oreilly/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Glenn Beck Review]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 15:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=5241#comment-966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have an expose on my home page this weekend about Cleon Skousen that you might find enlightening. You might be interested in listing The Glenn Beck Review on your blogroll if you want. I love your theme pic too.   I just found this, http://conservativesagainstglennbeck.blogspot.com that fortifies my position on Beck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an expose on my home page this weekend about Cleon Skousen that you might find enlightening. You might be interested in listing The Glenn Beck Review on your blogroll if you want. I love your theme pic too.   I just found this, <a href="http://conservativesagainstglennbeck.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://conservativesagainstglennbeck.blogspot.com</a> that fortifies my position on Beck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rush Limbaugh, Clear Channel, propaganda and economic reality by Tyler</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/05/05/rush-limbaugh-clear-channel-propaganda-and-economic-reality/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=6446#comment-945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush is a lousy tool.  Keep writing about things like this... people need to know.

Check out an article I wrote about Rush: http://americanillusion.org/?p=45]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush is a lousy tool.  Keep writing about things like this&#8230; people need to know.</p>
<p>Check out an article I wrote about Rush: <a href="http://americanillusion.org/?p=45" rel="nofollow">http://americanillusion.org/?p=45</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on continuing sorry story by Bernie Latham</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2010/01/07/continuing-sorry-story/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernie Latham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 04:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=7156#comment-937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Lulu

It would seem, wouldn&#039;t it, that if heaven holds those folks who are dead certain they belong there then that would provide perhaps the very best protection for the rest of us from serious social pathology.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lulu</p>
<p>It would seem, wouldn&#8217;t it, that if heaven holds those folks who are dead certain they belong there then that would provide perhaps the very best protection for the rest of us from serious social pathology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on continuing sorry story by luluwrites</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2010/01/07/continuing-sorry-story/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[luluwrites]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 05:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=7156#comment-935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ve managed to make hell sound desirable.  I can hardly wait.

Lulu]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve managed to make hell sound desirable.  I can hardly wait.</p>
<p>Lulu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dip in Obama popularity attributable soley to Republican support by James</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/02/23/dip-in-obama-popularity-attributable-soley-to-republican-support/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=4325#comment-934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKYjBl1jCvA&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-align:center; display: block;"><a href="http://bernielatham.com/2009/02/23/dip-in-obama-popularity-attributable-soley-to-republican-support/"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/SKYjBl1jCvA/2.jpg" alt="" /></a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friday stuff by Bernie Latham</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/11/13/friday-stuff/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernie Latham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=7121#comment-918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good day, Louis.  

He is a rather vacuous media presence, isn&#039;t he?  Hardly alone in that of course.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good day, Louis.  </p>
<p>He is a rather vacuous media presence, isn&#8217;t he?  Hardly alone in that of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Friday stuff by Louis Boileau</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/11/13/friday-stuff/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Boileau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=7121#comment-917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy to see that someone else shares my opinion of Wolf Blitzer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy to see that someone else shares my opinion of Wolf Blitzer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yikes! by euandus</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/04/30/yikes-16/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[euandus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=6390#comment-907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consider the presumptuousness in the banking lobby involving itself and insisting that its interests be served in Congress as it fashions financial regulatory reform.  That they are in any position to be part of that process is beyond at least John Galbraith.   If you are interested, here is my post:  http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/the-banking-lobby-on-the-presumptuousness-of-pushiness/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider the presumptuousness in the banking lobby involving itself and insisting that its interests be served in Congress as it fashions financial regulatory reform.  That they are in any position to be part of that process is beyond at least John Galbraith.   If you are interested, here is my post:  <a href="http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/the-banking-lobby-on-the-presumptuousness-of-pushiness/" rel="nofollow">http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/the-banking-lobby-on-the-presumptuousness-of-pushiness/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Principle.  It&#8217;s all about principle. by Bernie Latham</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/03/04/principle-its-all-about-principle/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernie Latham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=4704#comment-906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[euandus

I have to confess that  thoughtful post (at your blog)  isn&#039;t one I can speak to with any expertise.  But it&#039;s a great post.  Good luck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>euandus</p>
<p>I have to confess that  thoughtful post (at your blog)  isn&#8217;t one I can speak to with any expertise.  But it&#8217;s a great post.  Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Principle.  It&#8217;s all about principle. by euandus</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/03/04/principle-its-all-about-principle/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[euandus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=4704#comment-905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have noticed that some bloggers are questioning whether we should continue to have a Senate, partly because of the filibuster.  I just wrote a post on the U.S. Senate itself.  I argue that it was designed with discordant goals and that it should be more like the European Council in the EU in representing State governments.  Here is the link (in case you are interested): http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/the-u-s-senate-what-is-it-really/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed that some bloggers are questioning whether we should continue to have a Senate, partly because of the filibuster.  I just wrote a post on the U.S. Senate itself.  I argue that it was designed with discordant goals and that it should be more like the European Council in the EU in representing State governments.  Here is the link (in case you are interested): <a href="http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/the-u-s-senate-what-is-it-really/" rel="nofollow">http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/the-u-s-senate-what-is-it-really/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Drat by imsinca</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/10/26/drat-19/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[imsinca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=7108#comment-904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah but it&#039;s almost believable isn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah but it&#8217;s almost believable isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Drat by Bernie Latham</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/10/26/drat-19/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernie Latham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=7108#comment-903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imsinca

Parody.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imsinca</p>
<p>Parody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Drat by lmsinca</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/10/26/drat-19/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lmsinca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=7108#comment-902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bernie, I&#039;m having trouble distinguishing fact from fiction here.  Help me out, is this a real excerpt from the diary or just a parody?  I&#039;m being serious, I really can&#039;t tell.

http://www.salon.com/news/politics/sarah_palin/index.html?story=/mwt/feature/2009/10/25/secret_diary_sarah_palins_ghostwriter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bernie, I&#8217;m having trouble distinguishing fact from fiction here.  Help me out, is this a real excerpt from the diary or just a parody?  I&#8217;m being serious, I really can&#8217;t tell.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/sarah_palin/index.html?story=/mwt/feature/2009/10/25/secret_diary_sarah_palins_ghostwriter" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/news/politics/sarah_palin/index.html?story=/mwt/feature/2009/10/25/secret_diary_sarah_palins_ghostwriter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Drat by Bernie Latham</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/10/26/drat-19/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernie Latham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=7108#comment-901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Imsinca

Yes, I&#039;d caught mention of Armey&#039;s support for Hoffman but hadn&#039;t read this piece with its description of Hoffman as lacking knowledge and preparedness.  Not surprising this wouldn&#039;t bother Armey in the slightest given his earlier opinion that &quot;Politics is about 97 percent fiction and 3 percent imagination.&quot;  It&#039;s a handy justification for everything Armey gets up to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Imsinca</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;d caught mention of Armey&#8217;s support for Hoffman but hadn&#8217;t read this piece with its description of Hoffman as lacking knowledge and preparedness.  Not surprising this wouldn&#8217;t bother Armey in the slightest given his earlier opinion that &#8220;Politics is about 97 percent fiction and 3 percent imagination.&#8221;  It&#8217;s a handy justification for everything Armey gets up to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Drat by imsinca</title>
		<link>http://bernielatham.com/2009/10/26/drat-19/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[imsinca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bernielatham.com/?p=7108#comment-873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Bernie,

I just came across an interesting article at TPM.
It seems Dick Armey has been squiring Hoffman around town, he&#039;s the conservative Palin endorsed a couple of weeks ago creating a bit of a wave.  Apparently Hoffman isn&#039;t too well versed on the issues of his district.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/10/all_some_politics_is_local.php?ref=fpblg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bernie,</p>
<p>I just came across an interesting article at TPM.<br />
It seems Dick Armey has been squiring Hoffman around town, he&#8217;s the conservative Palin endorsed a couple of weeks ago creating a bit of a wave.  Apparently Hoffman isn&#8217;t too well versed on the issues of his district.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/10/all_some_politics_is_local.php?ref=fpblg" rel="nofollow">http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/10/all_some_politics_is_local.php?ref=fpblg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

