Category Archives: Israel/Palestine

Netanyahu and Obama

There’s nothing unpredictable or unpredicted regarding Netanyahu’s continuation of settlement in occupied Palestine.  He’s never held any other position.  Does he wish to have an unsympathetic US administration pressuring him to adopt a different policy?  Of course not.

And that presents the interesting question of whether his administration and allies are working in cooperation with those in the US who have pretty much identical ideologies and goals to hobble and, ideally, defeat the Obama administration and replace it with another of the GWB sort.

It would be, I think, deeply naive to imagine this isn’t the case.  If I’m right, then what we’ll see will be strategies to embarrass and frustrate the Obama administration through attempting to make them look weak and ineffective in the realm of foreign affairs.

Continuing apace will be the domestic strategy of trying to pull the Jewish vote away from its traditional home with Dems and move it to the RNC through exploiting fear and hatred.

Where it stands now

Frank Luntz, George Orwell and reverse-ethnic cleansing – a propaganda primer

So, 1) Israel occupies Palestinian land.

2) as that occupation is tenuous, Jewish settlements are built on the Palestinian land which makes extrication much more complicated (think Ireland and Protestant settlement)

3) as an obvious consequence, Palestinians are driven from their own land

4) world sentiment, UN resolutions, prior agreements between Israel and the US, and the Obama administration put constant pressure on Israel to stop new settlements and find a solution to those previously made on Palestinian land.

5) Frank Luntz (Republican marketer and strategist for hire) is hired by pro-Likud groups (or by Likud or both) to handle the PR problem in all of this.

6) Luntz devises a strategy where this pressure on Israel to cease new settlements on Palestinian land and to return prior land to displaced Palestinians will henceforth be described as ethnic cleansing of Jews and as anti-semitism.

7) various pro-Likud groups and supportive politicians in the US are instructed to sing the same song.

Read it here

Quote of the day – “Jumping the kosher shark” category

One of the things I find most interesting is that generally Evangelicals are so much more supportive of Israel than the American Jewish community. - Mike Huckabee

“And if Israel disagrees with this obvious fact, then we’ll bomb the shit out of it until Jesus comes”, Huckabee might have added.

I’ll let Josh Marshall (yes, he’s Jewish) at TPM explain this bit of madness.

This is true on many levels. But it also gets at deeper issues. One of which is the inability of the Republican party to attract substantial numbers of Jewish voters. This is treated as odd by many political observers, reasoning that the GOP has adopted such hard line positions on the Arab-Israeli conflict that surely this should lead to an increasing number of American Jews voting for the Republican party.

Some would say that the failure is explained by the fact that Jews are Americans and they’ve got a lot of other issues that matter to them beside Israel. Which is, of course, true. And needless to say, moonbat wailing to the contrary notwithstanding, the Democratic party is also extremely pro-Israel in its policies.

But the nature of GOP support for Israel is simply not aimed at or shaped by the support of Jewish voters. It’s support is aimed at a vastly larger evangelical Christian constituency. And the aims, mores, values, etc. of each group are profoundly different. (The most obvious difference is that American Jews tend to support Israel because of a mix of nationalism, ethnic identification, religious belief and democratic values while the religious right tends to support Israel because its existence will hasten the apocalypse when God will vanquish the Jews en masse in hellfire and turn Israel into a vast evangelical theme park. So the two groups sort of come at the issue from different perspectives.)

At one level, this is obvious: we know the religious right is a huge constituency for uber-hawk policies on Israel. But I’m not sure we think through its implications as clearly or as deeply as we might.

“Unintentionally revealing”

That’s the heading for a TPM piece that I’ll quote in full below:

Abraham Foxman, on Obama’s approach to the Israel-Palestine quagmire: “I continue to sense that the administration is putting too much weight on solving the conflict.”

Read Abe here

“Moral twilight zone” for Israeli soldiers in Gaza

Both McClatchy and the Guardian cover this story today.    The following excerpt is from McClatchy

JERUSALEM — Israeli combat soldiers have acknowledged that they forced Palestinian civilians to serve as human shields, needlessly killed unarmed Gazans and improperly used white phosphorus shells to burn down buildings as part of Israel’s three-week military offensive in the Gaza Strip last winter.

In filmed testimony and written statements released Wednesday, more than two dozen soldiers told an Israeli army veterans’ group that military commanders led the fighters into what one described as a “moral Twilight Zone” where almost every Palestinian was seen as a threat.

Is Netanyahu losing it?

From  Ha’aretz

…To appreciate the depth of his paranoia, it is enough to hear how he refers to Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, Obama’s senior aides: as “self-hating Jews.”

…Behind closed doors, Netanyahu’s coalition partners – including Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman – have also expressed shock at his behavior. One senior minister told an aide that he is finding it very difficult to work with the premier. “He drives us mad,” the minister said. “Every minute things change, and I am constantly busy doing maintenance on Netanyahu.”

h/t TPM

Obama wins in Lebananon

Juan Cole details the recent election in Lebanon and what it means.

Israel/Palestine…Obama/Netanyahu

A very good interview with Ami Ayalon, former commander of the Israeli Navy at

the Israeli Policy Forum

h/t Talking Points Memo

Netanyahu bumps into honesty

According to many observers in Washington and Israel, the Israeli prime minister, looking for loopholes and hidden agreements that have often existed in the past with Washington, has been flummoxed by an unusually united line that has come not just from the Obama White House and the secretary of state, but also from pro-Israel congressmen and women who have come through Israel for meetings with him over Memorial Day recess. To Netanyahu’s dismay, Obama doesn’t appear to have a hidden policy. It is what he said it was.

full story here

US and Israel

For those who haven’t been following the issue…the Obama and Netanyahu administrations are increasingly at odds.  That was predictable and predicted.
The key issue is settlements, not Iran, at least not yet

Update: A short but good (and promising) description of the present situation from  Matt Yglesias

Israel and Iran

The American Conservative carries two articles on this matter (conservative, not neoconservative) by  Michael C. Desch and by  John Mearsheimer

AIPAC and the propaganda battle to build support for an attack on Iran

Israel is in the midst of a massive diplomatic, political and intelligence campaign, both public and covert, that could lead – if those officials behind it have their way – towards a military strike on Iran. It is a war for the hearts and minds of Americans. Or you might call it the war before the war. In intelligence circles, this Israeli project is known as perception management and defined by the department of defence as:

Actions to convey and/or deny information … to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives and objective reasoning as well as to intelligence systems and leaders … ultimately resulting in foreign behaviours and official actions favourable to [US] objectives. In various ways, perception management combines truth projection, operations security, cover and deception and psychological operations.

The Israelis are following the template of the Bush administration’s run-up to the Iraq war. First, the US government advocated half-hearted efforts at diplomatic engagement. Then it ratcheted up pressure through sanctions and UN resolutions. That is where the Israeli campaign stands now.

Continue reading here

Update: Canton and Hoyer Forget to Take “AIPAC” Off Their Letter’s File Name

More AIPAC muscle

“AIPAC urges Congress members to sign letter to Barack Obama calling for Israel to set pace of negotiations with Palestinians.”

This is, as the Guardian notes, an attempt to forestall any efforts by the Obama administration to take any position on the Palestinian matter which doesn’t accord with Netanyahu/Likud hardline policies. The prior Bush administration took such a hands-off position to the detriment of everyone except those supporting the Likud position – and arguably to them as well even if they can no longer conceptualize how destructive they’ve been.

continue reading here

Future of Israel

A very good piece from Foreign Policy on the future choices before Israel by Stephen Walt

Here

Sanity? Honesty? Loose cannon speaking?

Israel will not attack Iran even if the international sanctions against Tehran fail to convince President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to give up his country’s nuclear program, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman told the Austrian daily Kleine Zeitung.In an interview published this weekend, Lieberman was asked whether Israel planned to strike Iran as a last resort.

“We are not talking about a military attack. Israel cannot resolve militarily the entire world’s problem. I propose that the United States, as the largest power in the world, take responsibility for resolving the Iranian question,” Lieberman told the paper.

Ha’aretz

J Street proving successful in fund-raising

Those of us who welcomed the appearance of a liberal jewish lobby to counter the existing Likud-allied groups functioning in Washington will likely find this item pleasing news:

When a group of Jewish liberals formed a lobbying and fundraising group called J Street a year ago, they had modest hopes of raising $50,000 for a handful of congressional candidates.

Instead, the group’s political arm ended up funneling nearly $600,000 to several dozen Democrats and a handful of Republicans in 2008, making it Washington’s leading pro-Israel PAC, according to Federal Election Commission expenditure records. Organizers say 33 of the group’s 41 favored House and Senate candidates won their races.

“It certainly exceeded our expectations,” said Jeremy Ben-Ami, J Street’s executive director. “We didn’t know what level of success we would have. But we think this is a message whose moment has come.”

Riding alongside the ascent of President Obama and other liberal Democrats, J Street blends old-style politicking with a media-savvy approach aimed at altering the U.S. political debate over Israel and other Middle East issues.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/16/AR2009041603995.html?hpid=sec-politics

Lieberman’s tenure may not be long

The corruption investigation into Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman is likely to produce charges of money laundering, fraud and breach of trust, police sources said Saturday, adding that questioning of the Yisrael Beiteinu leader was nearing an end.

Ha’aretz story here

Headline of the day – “you needed a question mark?” category

Are New York Jews a target if Israel strikes Iran?

Paranoia or propaganda? Hard to tell

Here’s the first paragraph from a Jerusalem Post piece by Caroline Glick (linked, of course, at the National Review)…

In the chanceries of Europe, the die has apparently been cast. The time has come to launch an all-out diplomatic war against Israel. That is, the time has come to begin to unravel EU acceptance of Israel’s right to exist.

Column here and no, it doesn’t get any more clear-headed.

Avigdor Lieberman grilled by police

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman was questioned by police on Friday for the second time since being sworn into his position earlier this week.

Police questioned the foreign minister for more than five hours and said to expect another round in the coming week.

Lieberman was questioned on Thursday for more than seven hours about suspicions of bribery, money laundering, fraud and breach of trust, less than a day after he took office in the new government. National fraud unit detectives questioned the chairman of Yisrael Beiteinu under caution as a probe of his business-dealings proceeds.

Police sources said Lieberman may be indicted within a few months. Lieberman denies any wrongdoing and says the probe is politically motivated.

Aside from the observation that politics in Israel is apparently as corrupt as it is here, it will be a good turn of events if this fellow gets discredited and removed from his present position of power. Not least because so long as he is in Netanyahu’s government, Netanyahu by comparison looks rational, which he isn’t.

story at Ha’aretz