Wendell Potter, former head of Public Relations for Cigna, speaks out against his industry…
-
Recent Comments
Best Periodical Period
Best Site Anywhere
Political Sites
- Air America
- American News Project
- Andrew Sullivan
- Arts and Letters Daily
- Balloon Juice (John Cole)
- Brad DeLong
- Consortium News
- Crooks and Liars
- Democratic Strategist
- Digby
- Editor and Publisher
- Eric Alterman
- Eschaton
- Fora TV
- Huffington Post
- Juan Cole
- Kos
- McClatchy
- Media Matters
- Observationalism
- Paul Krugman
- Pew’s Journalism.org
- Pro Publica
- Real News Network
- Salon
- Slate
- Talking Points Memo
- TalkLeft
- The Plum Line (Greg Sargent)
- Think Progress
- Tom Dispatch
- Washington Independent
WordPress
x train yus
Pages
Archives
- February 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- March 2011
- December 2010
- September 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
Meta
It was a good interview and his comments were insightful. However, and realize this partly stems from the fact that I have spent my entire adult career in the insurance industry (although not health insurance) the press seems to focus on only one aspect of this crisis – the evil insurance industry.
I am a huge proponent of health care reform and public health care options. But the discussion regarding the necessity of reform tends to overlook the other contributors to this mess – pharma and medical device/equipment providers as well as the medical service providers /healthcare delivery system.
Hospitals order unnessecary procedures because they need to pay for the latest MRI equipment that provides limited improvement over the equipment they bought two years ago. They charge outrageous prices to fund their continual expansion and focus expansion on specialties not based on community need, but on where the money is. Drs. prescribe drugs based on the benefit they receive from a particular pharma company. They have expectations of how much they should be compensated based not on their ability but on what society owes them because of their exaulted position and the reverence it commands. They make medical decisions based not on what is in the patient’s best interest and most cost effective but on which procedure is least likely to leave them vulnerable to second guessing and liability exposure
Sorry Bernie – I didn’t mean to hit the submit button. I hadn’t ended it, edited or cleaned it up at all. You got my initial ravings, not the well thought out, organized and considerably briefer response I intended to leave. At this point, I think I will just shut up.