Daily Archives: Monday, May 11, 2009

“Party of No”? Fred Barnes thinks it’s a peachy idea (“it’s the route to Republican landslides”)

Improving the party’s image is a worthy cause, but it isn’t what Republicans ought to be emphasizing right now. They have a more important mission: to be the party of no. And not just a party that bucks Obama and Democrats on easy issues like releasing Gitmo terrorists in this country, but one committed to aggressive, attention-grabbing opposition to the entire Obama agenda.
read here

Not surprising, of course, given that his boss (Bill Kristol) has been saying the same thing since 1993 when he argued in a now-famous memo that if Clinton was successful in reforming medicare then the consequence would be an electoral wilderness for the GOP.  Never mind the sick and uninsured…party success is all that is deemed important by these rather non-empathetic people.

Wanda Sykes

Duh. Apparently, Washington is all aflutter regarding Syke’s comedy routine at the Correspondent’s Dinner. Was she mean to Rush? Did she go “over the line”?

We could recall that following Colbert’s now famous routine at the same dinner while Bush was in office gained the same species of shallow response from nearly everyone in the media. Olbermann, for example, opined that Colbert had “gone too far”.

Not sure what to say on idiocy this ubiquitous in the Washington bubble.

Motherlovers

Justin Timberlake and Andy Samberg (SNL). Bloody brilliant…

Watch it

Health care reform hurdles

To the degree that the Republican Party fails electorally, business interests which have advanced their goals mainly via that party will gradually shift their lobbying and power-leveraging over to the Dems.

Here’s Krugman from today’s column discussing the medical/insurance/pharmaceutical industies’ seranading of Obama…

Before we start celebrating, however, we have to ask the obvious question. Is this gift a Trojan horse? After all, several of the organizations that sent that letter have in the past been major villains when it comes to health care policy.

I’ve already mentioned AHIP. There’s also the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), the lobbying group that helped push through the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 — a bill that both prevented Medicare from bargaining over drug prices and locked in huge overpayments to private insurers. Indeed, one of the new letter’s signatories is former Representative Billy Tauzin, who shepherded that bill through Congress then immediately left public office to become PhRMA’s lavishly paid president.

The point is that there’s every reason to be cynical about these players’ motives. Remember that what the rest of us call health care costs, they call income.

What’s presumably going on here is that key interest groups have realized that health care reform is going to happen no matter what they do, and that aligning themselves with the Party of No will just deny them a seat at the table. (Republicans, after all, still denounce research into which medical procedures are effective and which are not as a dastardly plot to deprive Americans of their freedom to choose.)

I would strongly urge the Obama administration to hang tough in the bargaining ahead. In particular, AHIP will surely try to use the good will created by its stance on cost control to kill an important part of health reform: giving Americans the choice of buying into a public insurance plan as an alternative to private insurers. The administration should not give in on this point.

But let me not be too negative. The fact that the medical-industrial complex is trying to shape health care reform rather than block it is a tremendously good omen. It looks as if America may finally get what every other advanced country already has: a system that guarantees essential health care to all its citizens.

Full column here

Update: Ezra Klein is cynical:

Jon Cohn is enthused. Paul Krugman is excited. Maybe I’m just churlish. Maybe I’m getting cranky as I age. But I can’t shake my skepticism about today’s big health care announcement.  Jon Cohn is enthused. Paul Krugman is excited. Maybe I’m just churlish. Maybe I’m getting cranky as I age. But I can’t shake my skepticism about today’s big health care announcement…

Update 2: And the Swift Boat crowd does their thing on healthcare, of course

Sheesh

Left Portland at 5AM and got into San Diego about 10PM.  Out the next morning at 7AM, side trip over to UC Santa Barbara (a tad smokey but beautiful site on the ocean) then back up to Portland getting in at 3:30 AM.   Hallucinations began a bit north of Redding.  I’ll be hesitant to do that much driving again.  And my bum seems to have suffered a stroke.   Side note: the 160 figure on my speedometer remains theoretical (California’s roads are not in good shape) but the next increment down is real world.

Still, I love the drive down to southern California and time with daughter is always a guaranteed treat.  She’s flying up to Dawson City in the Yukon today.