Monthly Archives: May 2009

They are going to take your guns away (and your baby food!)

Manufacturers of cans for beverages and foods and some of their biggest customers, including Coca-Cola, are trying to devise a public relations and lobbying strategy to block government bans of a controversial chemical used in the linings of metal cans and lids.

…Industry representatives weighed a range of ideas, including “using fear tactics [e.g. “Do you want to have access to baby food anymore?” as well as giving control back to consumers (e.g. you have a choice between the more expensive product that is frozen or fresh or foods packaged in cans) as ways to dissuade people from choosing BPA-free packaging,” the notes said

get disgusted here

US and Israel

For those who haven’t been following the issue…the Obama and Netanyahu administrations are increasingly at odds.  That was predictable and predicted.
The key issue is settlements, not Iran, at least not yet

Update: A short but good (and promising) description of the present situation from  Matt Yglesias

From our “some things never change and we appreciate why” file

Former President George W. Bush will make a stop in Michiana on Thursday. He is scheduled to speak to the Economic Club in Benton Harbor this evening. Mister Bush will answer questions that have been submitted.

think progress

Just the sort of intellect one wants as President.

So, just who is slipping over the border to get all that good healthcare availble elsewhere?

Everyone knows that lots of Canadians come to America in search of medical care. But what everyone knows is wrong: a careful study concluded,

The numbers of true medical refugees—Canadians coming south with their own money to purchase U.S. health care—appear to be handfuls rather than hordes.

On the other hand:

Driven by rising health care costs at home, nearly 1 million Californians cross the border each year to seek medical care in Mexico, according a new paper by UCLA researchers and colleagues published today in the journal Medical Care.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/27/sun-sand-and-surgery/

Special bonus quote for the day – “Precisely!” category

Douglas Holtz-Eakin wants a conservative version of the Center for American Progress. But as Matt Yglesias points out, there are plenty of think tanks on the right, funded at levels beyond the left’s wildest dreams. If CAP is running rings around right-wing think tanks intellectually — which it is — it’s not due to a lack of institutions or funding.

So what’s the right’s problem? That’s easy: conservative think tanks are short of new ideas because new ideas were the last thing the billionaire funders of those institutions wanted. What they wanted, and still want, is validation of their prejudices…

Paul Krugman (read the whole blog post, particularly the quote from David Broder)

Quote of the day – “only the disadvantaged are priviledge these days and that just isn’t fair” category

if conservatives continue to be unable to restrain themselves from loud whining about how society unfairly tilts the odds in favor of Puerto Rican girls growing up in housing projects in the Bronx, they’ll presumably continue their current trajectory of alienating Hispanic voters.

Matt Yglesias

Republican Party – victims dispossessed (but they know who dispossessed them)

From Rush Limbaugh’s radio show yesterday…

“…if ever a civil rights movement was needed in America, it is for the Republican Party… If ever we needed to start marching for freedom and constitutional rights, it’s for the Republican Party. The Republican Party is today’s oppressed minority.”   see here

This notion or sense of victimization has been an abiding undercurrent in the new conservative movement.   For example, Christianity is commonly held to be under dire threat even while constituting 75% of the American population (atheists at four tenths of one percent).  Or, if we were attending to the last several days’ complaints from the modern right re Sotomayer’s nomination to the SC, one gets the clear notion that the Court and American society just has no place for white men of European descent.  The end, clearly, is nigh.

This isn’t new in American culture.  But Limbaugh and others in the modern conservative movement have merely tuned it to a high pitch.  From Richard Hofstadter’s famous essay, The Parnaoid Style in American Politics…

The paranoid spokesman sees the fate of conspiracy in apocalyptic terms—he traffics in the birth and death of whole worlds, whole political orders, whole systems of human values. He is always manning the barricades of civilization. He constantly lives at a turning point. Like religious millenialists he expresses the anxiety of those who are living through the last days and he is sometimes disposed to set a date fort the apocalypse. (“Time is running out,” said Welch in 1951. “Evidence is piling up on many sides and from many sources that October 1952 is the fatal month when Stalin will attack.”)
As a member of the avant-garde who is capable of perceiving the conspiracy before it is fully obvious to an as yet unaroused public, the paranoid is a militant leader. He does not see social conflict as something to be mediated and compromised, in the manner of the working politician. Since what is at stake is always a conflict between absolute good and absolute evil, what is necessary is not compromise but the will to fight things out to a finish. Since the enemy is thought of as being totally evil and totally unappeasable, he must be totally eliminated—if not from the world, at least from the theatre of operations to which the paranoid directs his attention. This demand for total triumph leads to the formulation of hopelessly unrealistic goals, and since these goals are not even remotely attainable, failure constantly heightens the paranoid’s sense of frustration. Even partial success leaves him with the same feeling of powerlessness with which he began, and this in turn only strengthens his awareness of the vast and terrifying quality of the enemy he opposes.
The enemy is clearly delineated: he is a perfect model of malice, a kind of amoral superman—sinister, ubiquitous, powerful, cruel, sensual, luxury-loving. Unlike the rest of us, the enemy is not caught in the toils of the vast mechanism of history, himself a victim of his past, his desires, his limitations. He wills, indeed he manufactures, the mechanism of history, or tries to deflect the normal course of history in an evil way. He makes crises, starts runs on banks, causes depressions, manufactures disasters, and then enjoys and profits from the misery he has produced. The paranoid’s interpretation of history is distinctly personal: decisive events are not taken as part of the stream of history, but as the consequences of someone’s will. Very often the enemy is held to possess some especially effective source of power: he controls the press; he has unlimited funds; he has a new secret for influencing the mind (brainwashing); he has a special technique for seduction (the Catholic confessional).
It is hard to resist the conclusion that this enemy is on many counts the projection of the self; both the ideal and the unacceptable aspects of the self are attributed to him. The enemy may be the cosmopolitan intellectual, but the paranoid will outdo him in the apparatus of scholarship, even of pedantry. Secret organizations set up to combat secret organizations give the same flattery. The Ku Klux Klan imitated Catholicism to the point of donning priestly vestments, developing an elaborate ritual and an equally elaborate hierarchy. The John Birch Society emulates Communist cells and quasi-secret operation through “front” groups, and preaches a ruthless prosecution of the ideological war along lines very similar to those it finds in the Communist enemy.* Spokesmen of the various fundamentalist anti-Communist “crusades” openly express their admiration for the dedication and discipline the Communist cause calls forth.
On the other hand, the sexual freedom often attributed to the enemy, his lack of moral inhibition, his possession of especially effective techniques for fulfilling his desires, give exponents of the paranoid style an opportunity to project and express unacknowledgeable aspects of their own psychological concerns. Catholics and Mormons—later, Negroes and Jews—have lent themselves to a preoccupation with illicit sex. Very often the fantasies of true believers reveal strong sadomasochistic outlets, vividly expressed, for example, in the delight of anti-Masons with the cruelty of Masonic punishments.

Update

Looks like we’re going to do the jewelry store thing again.  We’ll have our own work there, of course, along with a dozen or so other artists and some accessories.   Wish us luck, if you’d be so kind.

try this

http://lab.andre-michelle.com/tonematrix

h/t andrew sullivan

The US of A and world domination

USA dominates World Beard and Moustache Championships

Obama world vs Cheney world

A typically right-on-the-money view from Eugene Robinson.

Note

We’ve been in the process here of negotiating purchase of a local jewelry store (we’d had one in Manhattan). Given that goes as planned, I’ll be in the store most days but will have several hours in the mornings to fiddle here.

Our job is stenography (aka, conduit for propaganda and manipulation)

From Matt Yglesias

News That’s Fit to Print, Plus This

More tales of the MSM as a New York Times article discusses Republican messaging on Gitmo at great length while doing basically nothing to assess the merits of the underlying claims.

Outside a tiny circle of people who work in politics or political messaging full-time, the ins-and-outs of GOP messaging tactics has no impact whatsoever on the American people. By contrast, people would be really interested to know if it’s actually true that the President of the United States is proposing to create a dangerous situation in which terrorists are likely to escape from prison and murder people. I think people would also be really genuinely interested in whether or not their elected representatives in the US House and Senate are lying to them. Yet the Times article gives us no real insight into those issues. Instead, it treats the debate like it’s maybe a hockey game.

Not unusual, of course, but I think it’s always worth pointing out.

Smith and Phelps…?

It is widely viewed as being the greatest scoop in newspaper history. But 37 years after the Watergate scandal, which turned the Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein into household names, it has emerged they could have been replaced in the pantheon of investigative journalism by Robert Smith and Robert Phelps.

Smith and Phelps, two New York Times journalists in 1972, have finally come forward to admit that they were given key information about the cover-up that led to the ignominious fall of Richard Nixon. But they dropped the ball.

The tip-off was made to Smith, a reporter on the newspaper, at a private lunch with Patrick Gray, acting director of the FBI, on 16 August 1972. That was two months after a group was caught breaking into a room at the Watergate hotel, in Washington, in an attempt to bug the headquarters of the Democratic party in election year.

Guardian story here

Quote of the day

The United tates today is both the world’s largest importer of illicit drugs and the world’s largest exporter of bad drug policy  -  Moses Naim

h/t Foreign Policy

Today’s quality snark

Andrew Sullivan quotes Reihan Salam:

Could it be that Cheney, who has sound-enough political instincts to realize that the GOP is in dangerously weak shape, is finally gunning for the top job? If not, would he consider “guiding” another young pup from the office of the vice president? Right now this sounds like a surreal nightmare, one that would lead the five boroughs of New York and large swaths of Southern California to saw themselves off from the American mainland and try their luck as minor outlying islands. But stranger things have happened.

And Sullivan’s response:

Name one.

Israel and Iran

The American Conservative carries two articles on this matter (conservative, not neoconservative) by  Michael C. Desch and by  John Mearsheimer

Cheney

I’ve written a fair bit elsewhere about yesterday’s two speeches and how we ought to think about them and I won’t bother to repeat it here but I will steer you to Michael Tomasky’s piece in the Guardian this morning.

But the second issue here is psychological, and this cuts much deeper than politics. Cheney wants Americans to live in fear. He believes that we should be living in more or less constant fear of another attack. I suppose it probably occurred to him over the years that, when a people are whipped into a fearful state, they tend to hand their leaders more power. But now he’s out of office, so this can’t be his motivation. I think it’s just how he sees the world.

Obama wants to move people beyond fear. “If we continue to make decisions from within a climate of fear,” he said, “we will make more mistakes.” Are the American people up to this? More to the point – and more depressing to consider – are Washington politicians? We will find out as this debate plays out.

In either case, this argument is a long way from being settled. Cheney will see to that. He’ll stir the pot the moment he sees the contents settling. But he’s really pushing it.

Let’s cut to the chase: If, God forbid, there is another terrorist attack on America, Cheney has with this speech ensured that rather than uniting behind the sitting administration – as conservatives insisted we all must do eight years ago – this country will be torn in two. That’s a very toxic and dangerous game, and it certainly won’t make for a stronger country. NOw who’s playing politics with national security?

Full piece here

The principles, the authority and the reality of the Catholic Church

Prior to last week, as part of an organized effort to to derogate the present Obama administration and its policies, the Cardinal Newman Society,  an extremist corner of the American Catholic community with  ties to the Republican party and the conservative movement mounted an aggressive media campaign against Notre Dame’s invitation to Obama to give the commencement speech.

Nearly 65,000 people have signed an online petition protesting President Obama’s scheduled May 17 commencement address at the University of Notre Dame, saying the president’s views on abortion and stem cell research “directly contradict” Roman Catholic teachings.

“It is an outrage and a scandal that ‘Our Lady’s University,’ one of the premier Catholic universities in the United States, would bestow such an honor on President Obama given his clear support for policies and laws that directly contradict fundamental Catholic teachings on life and marriage,” the petition at notredamescandal.com reads.

One might fairly ask, given yesterday’s publication of an investigation of the Catholic Church in Ireland, just how those “fundamental Catholic teachings on life and marriage” are actually instantiated within the Church itself.  One might also fairly ask for comment on this matter from the Cardinal Newman Society and from conservative movement luminary, Brent Bozell III, who sits on the board as director.

Catholic Church shamed by Irish abuse report

By SHAWN POGATCHNIK
The Associated Press
Thursday, May 21, 2009 2:24 AM

DUBLIN — After a nine-year investigation, a commission published a damning report Wednesday on decades of rapes, humiliation and beatings at Catholic Church-run reform schools for Ireland’s castaway children.

The 2,600-page report painted the most detailed and damning portrait yet of church-administered abuse in a country grown weary of revelations about child molestation by priests.

The investigation of the tax-supported schools uncovered previously secret Vatican records that demonstrated church knowledge of pedophiles in their ranks all the way back to the 1930s.

Wednesday’s five-volume report on the probe _ which was resisted by Catholic religious orders _ concluded that church officials shielded their orders’ pedophiles from arrest amid a culture of self-serving secrecy.

“A climate of fear, created by pervasive, excessive and arbitrary punishment, permeated most of the institutions and all those run for boys. Children lived with the daily terror of not knowing where the next beating was coming from,” Ireland’s Commission to Inquire Into Child Abuse concluded.

Victims of the abuse, who are now in their 50s to 80s, lobbied long and hard for an official investigation. They say that for all its incredible detail, the report doesn’t nail down what really matters _ the names of their abusers.

“I do genuinely believe that it would have been a further step towards our healing if our abusers had been named and shamed,” said Christine Buckley, 62, who spent the first 18 years of her life in a Dublin orphanage where children were forced to manufacture rosaries _ and were humiliated, beaten and raped whether they achieved their quota or not.

The Catholic religious orders that ran more than 50 workhouse-style reform schools from the late 19th century until the mid-1990s offered public words of apology, shame and regret Wednesday. But when questioned, their leaders indicated they would continue to protect the identities of clergy accused of abuse _ men and women who were never reported to police, and were instead permitted to change jobs and keep harming children.

The full ugly story here

Revolving door corruption of Washington

More than one in four of President Bush’s Cabinet “have landed jobs with consulting or lobbying firms in which they can help clients navigate the departments they once oversaw.” Ten of the 34 Cabinet secretaries that served under Bush — including Michael Chertoff, John Ashcroft, Tom Ridge, and Gale Norton — “have registered as lobbyists or joined consulting or lobbying firms” or “sit on the boards or work forindustries they regulated.”

from Think Progress

Michael Tomasky writes a review of  “So Damn Much Money: The Triumph of Lobbying and the Corrosion of American Government” in the Apr 9 issue of the NYRB but unfortunately it is behind their pay wall.   But as usual, it’s only $3 to access this piece and well worth it.