Daily Archives: Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Just because

frost2

h/t george

Photo from Obama’s trip to Britain

G20/

How fucking cool is this?  One presumes violation of protocol here which makes it all the better.  This ranks as one of my all time favorite photographs.

h/t Myron

Catching them at it

Fox’s Neil Cavuto, before cameras are rolling, is recorded estimating crowd size at 5,000 but then when cameras are on,  he says something quite different

And then there’s the Fox News reporter (well, loosely defined) wondering when Americans will “wake up and start fighting the fascism that seems to be permeating this country.”   that’s here

Israeli government continues its self-destructive stupidhood

Via Reuters, the Israeli government communicated to the UN Human Rights Council that it will not cooperate with an investigation into alleged Israeli and Hamas crimes surrounding the December 2008-January 2009 Israeli incursion into Gaza.  The inquiry is to be lead by Judge Richard Goldstone, a highly regarded South African jurist and international humanitarian law scholar.

This is a shame.  A decision to not cooperate with the investigation  implies that Israel believes it has something to hide.  I say this because Goldstone is the type of person who has no agenda but to get at the truth.

Over  the long run, a public accounting of what did and did not happen during Operation Cast Lead can help lay the foundation for a lasting peace in the region.  Let the man do his job.

UN Dispatch

It seems that the integrity of this man is precisely the problem.  Were he to find that the IDF was in significant violation of Israeli or international conventions, the defensive stance they’ve regularly taken (“the UN has anti-Semitic elements”) would not be available.

Two in a row from Gerson

Goodness.  It’s like some Bizarro Planet end of days phenomenon.  Gerson has written another column that isn’t simply partisan propaganda.  Still, he can’t help but throw in a straw man in paragraph one.  Habit?  Personality flaw?  Who knows.

Religion has often unintentionally enabled scientific skepticism. The faithful will issue a challenge to science: Ha, you can’t explain the development of life, or the moral sense, or the nearly universal persistence of religion. To which the materialist responds: Can too. It is all biology and chemistry, thus disproving your God hypothesis.

A bit later, he flirts with a more honest assessment of that straw man, but it’s a flirtation only.  Good christians don’t go all the way.

And he does not contend, as philosophically lazy scientists sometimes do, that a biological propensity toward belief automatically disproves the existence of an object of such belief.

He’s right in that this would be an unjustifiable (and lazy) claim but serious discussion of these issues (by scientists or philosophers) doesn’t include it.

Full column here