Daily Archives: Friday, March 13, 2009

Ross Douthat

I’d expressed my satisfaction with this new (conservative) hire to the NY Times to replace Kristol and as I noted in an update, Dougj at Balloon Juice was not in agreement   see here

I just noticed that Brad DeLong comes out on my side (maybe) that’s here

Update: Here’s my optimism handed back to me, very well-done…
Katha Pollitt of The Nation on Douthat

God damn.  The conservative movement, in its self-radicalization (not merely removing moderates but removing the potential paths for most anyone but radicals to move through and up) has done great harm to the polity.

Lovin’ Jon

The famous Crossfire interview (Crossfire closed shop soon after)

Jon interviewing Wolf Blitzer – watch it here

Jon interviewing Jonah Goldberg - watch it here

h/t Andrew Sullivan

More drat!

Ann Coulter’s Book Sales Head South

Today’s best question

Steve Benen/ on the Stewart/Cramer episode last evening:

Watching the evisceration, I couldn’t help but wonder why it takes a comedian on Comedy Central to do the kind of interview the non-fake news shows ought to be doing. When the media establishment marvels at Jon Stewart’s popularity, they tend to think it’s his humor. It’s not. It’s because he calls “bullsh*t” when most major media players won’t. He did so last night, and it made for important viewing.

Conservative talk radio

It seems that the Obama appointees actually have almost the same exact policies as the Nazi Party did. Michael Savage  (real name, Michael Alan Weiner)

h/t Media Matters

Drat!

American Enterprise Institute, the “bomb everybody right this minute!” think tank that gave us Wolfowitz and Perle and Cheney (Dick and Lynne)  and Michael Ledeen and John Bolton and Iraq and global warming denial and so much of the insanity of administrations from Reagan through Bush 2 is, I am sad to report, having serious funding problems.

Read this sad tale here

It’s closing time

From TPM

Big Day In Minnesota: Closing Arguments
Closing arguments in the Minnesota election trial are scheduled for today. Each side will have an hour at bat to make their final case to the judges. After that, the judges are expected to spend two to three weeks working on a determination of who has legally won the most votes, and is entitled to the certificate of election — a decision that is likely to be appealed.

Interesting to watch now as:
1) Franken looks likely to win
2) Republicans do NOT want Franken seated (less easy to filibuster in Senate votes)
3) the Coleman campaign just screwed up royally and posted financial data of past donors
4) fewer dollars coming in (donors don’t trust the campaign now) and appeals will be expensive
5) if Coleman loses this case, he also pays Franken’s costs
6) Franken’s lawyers can (and surely will) move to have the Coleman campaign put money up front for costs of appeals should he lose
7) all of which means really big bucks for Coleman real soon while his donor base got schmucked

Hyper photographs

Chaz Freeman oddity

The Chaz Freeman story has seriously increased the number of visitors to this blog.  I’m trying to figure that one out.  There was very little in the mainstream press on the issue until the day he pulled out.  I’m guessing that lots of people were interested and had to get informed via the blog world.  Interesting phenomenon.  If any of you who come here looking for more on the Freeman story might email me or post a comment here with as brief an account of why/how you got here, I’d appreciate it.

Bernie Latham

The ad hominem – an example from Laura Ingraham

As I’ve noted before, rightwing radio is chockablock full of logical fallacies.  It’s what they do and they couldn’t continue without them.  The ad hominem is, of course, the avoidance of any address to what the person argues through redirecting attention to something about the person (as contrasted with the person’s statement).

MCCAIN (on MSNBC): And I think there’s an extreme on both parties and I hate extreme. I don’t understand. I have friends that are the most radically conservative and radically liberal people possibly ever and we all get along. We can find a middle ground.

INGRAHAM (mocking): Ok, I was really hoping that I was going to get that role in the Real World, but then I realized that, well, they don’t like plus-sized models. They only like the women who look a certain way. And on this 50th anniversary of Barbie, I really have something to say.

from Think Progress

Michelle Bachmann (“Michael Steele – you da man!”) lying through them white teeth

From Think Progress

On Fox Business yesterday, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) joined the long parade of members of Congress who rail against earmarks while requesting their own. But Bachmann took her hypocrisy a step further, claiming that she has signed an anti-pork pledge.

In fact, according to Legistorm, Bachmann has requested 7 earmarks in Fiscal Year 2008 costing tax payers a total of $3,767,600. Some examples:

- $94,000 for Sheriffs Youth Program of MN
- $335,000 for Equipment Acquisition for Northland Medical Center
- $803,000 for Replacement Small Buses, St. Cloud Metro Bus

As MSNBC’s David Shuster noted, Bachmann indeed signed the Club for Growth’s ‘No Earmark’ pledge back in 2008. While she clearly broke this pledge, Bachmann’s name is curiously absent from the list of lawmakers making the same pledge for 2009.

Fora TV – Ani DiFranco on file sharing

you need to go no further than right here

(note as well the other Fora music options on the right)

The creation and maintenance of the Reagan myth

Will Bunch, author of the recently released book on the Reagan myth (I’m presently reading it and it’s wonderful) is the subject of this piece by Joe Strupp at Editor and Publisher.

find it here

Credit default swaps explained

h/t McClatchy

Kitten break

Quote of the day – “Ditto time capsule” category

Rush Limbaugh broadcast, Oct 15, 1992 (before a Clinton/Bush 1 debate)

When Bill Clinton says we are in the worst economic period in 50 years, the President has a right to be angry. The worst economic period in the last 50 years was under Jimmy Carter, which led to the 1981-82 recession, a recession more punishing than the current one.

Indeed, let Mr. Bush press Mr. Clinton to do the math on his “Putting Government First” economic plan, which will devastate American business. And when the Governor says, “We don’t need any more trickle-down economics,” the President must pointedly ask why the Democratic Party always runs against prosperity.

h/t digby (there’s lots more)

I imagine Michael Steele and Jim Cramer getting really drunk together

Jim Cramer, the screaming money guy from CNBC, appeared on Stewart’s show last night (I haven’t seen it yet but I’ll post it when I find it) in round 4 of their prize fight.  You got to hand it to Cramer who’s a tad light in the loafers for putting himself in this position.

What “Daily Show” viewers saw on Thursday night wasn’t a boring love-in; it was a smackdown, or perhaps an homage to the human sacrifice scene from “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom” — the one where they rip the victim’s heart out and show it to him. At the very least, it was a riveting half-hour, something almost completely unlike anything else ever seen on television.

Alex Koppelman details the bloodbath


Update: Crooks and Liars has the video

Bollywar? Bollyweapons? – you aren’t going to believe this one

This is a promotional film from Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, Israel’s armament development authority.  Ha’aretz story here

Headline of the day – “Playing it safe” category

Man dressed as Batman character the Joker shot dead by police

Michael Gerson hacks again

This fellow’s apparent inability to see the beam in his own eye is pretty astounding.

Following Obama during the New Hampshire primary, I saw a candidate who — though I disagreed with him on many issues — defended idealism and rhetoric against the supremely cynical Clinton machine, who brought a religious sensibility to matters of social justice, who took care to understand and accommodate the arguments of others, who provided a temperamental contrast to culture-war politics.

The Clinton machine was “supremely cynical” says the speechwriter for the Bush administration.  That’s a tad much.  And, Gerson insists he was ‘refreshed’ by Obama’s “contrast to culture-war politics”.   Perhaps a bit slow coming to that revelation, Michael.

Where else can we find specks in Obama’s eye?

constant allocation of blame to others

childish cultivation of controversy with conservative media figures to favorably polarize the electorate

The pledge of “bipartisan” cooperation has become an attempt to shove Republicans until their backs reach some wall of outrage and humiliation.

But then Gerson covers his hypocritical ass (perhaps like the torture memo rewrites)

None of this is new or exceptional — which is the point. It is exactly the way things have always been done.

Translation: Obama is not the Messiah after all and we had it on the best of authority (Rush Limbaugh) that he was.  How dare Obama not live up to Rush’s propaganda trope or to my own dreams of what government could look like if, say, I was part of it and had the opportunity to sculpt my ideals there in the reality-based community.

Some relish this kind of politics. But the false dawn of post-partisanship is no reason for celebration. Ideological war creates an atmosphere in which the angry predominate — and it can cause anger to rise unbidden within all of us. While in government, I saw the persistent, moaning critics outside the window. Now I have dug my tunnel and joined them. It is not where I want to be — or where American politics might have been.

Yeah, Michael, some do relish it.  I expect you dine with them several times a week.  You’re probably not a bad fellow but you’re still blind as a bat because you only pretend to having done any penance for what you and your buddies created and for which you are now ( irony of biblical proportions) so terribly victimized by.