Daily Archives: Monday, February 9, 2009

How a blog ends the day

Whistling past the grave

Do you have too much hair?  Watch this and you’ll be pulling it out.  These incredible CNBC moneyshow arseholes do NOT get it.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1027496846&play=1

h/t TPM

Let us acknowledge it!

Today, the President of the United States conducted a townhall meeting before a group of American citizens who HAD NOT BEEN PRE-SCREENED FOR PARTY AFFILIATION AND IDEOLOGICAL PURITY and he answered their questions.

Let us acknowledge it.  Because what preceded was authoritarian and anti-democratic.

First press conference

President as smartest guy in the room.  I’d forgotten what that might feel like.  With Bush, it was always just the opposite with the singular exception of those times Jeff Gannon (8 1/2 inches, uncut) attended.

He used the bully-pulpit to very good effect, hammering home the follies and irresponsibility of the previous administration and its ideology.  He underlined the counter-productiveness of the political games (obstruct, hurt the other guy, speak deceitfully for imagined gain, etc) stressing how this period of time demands something much higher in that scale of civic wisdom and duty.  He answered questions clearly and with the species of authority which arises from knowledge and intelligence rather than as a shallow consequence of holding a title, as W did.  He handled the press briskly though with the respect due.  He didn’t make the error, common to we liberals, of excessive abstraction or wonk but very effectively put the example of a particular community and its people right up front in his intro comments and later in his answers.

This is one talented fellow.

Joseph Stiglitz and others

When the American economy enters a downturn, you often hear the experts debating whether it is likely to be V-shaped (short and sharp) or U-shaped (longer but milder). Today, the American economy may be entering a downturn that is best described as L-shaped. It is in a very low place indeed, and likely to remain there for some time to come.

continue reading here:  http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/11/stiglitz200811

And here’s Robert Reich on the stimulus bill (he gives it an A minus)  http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/02/tpmtv_talks_to_robert_reich.php

h/t Greg Sargant, the plum line

Brad DeLong:

“The compromise is worse than the original bill because it is smaller, and the changes appear to have reduced rather than increased the bang-for-buck effectiveness of the bill.  Ben Nelson and Susan Collins don’t appear to have understood what they were doing very well — the point is to keep lots of extra Americans from being unemployed for the next two years and have them, instead, do useful things for the country. Nelson and Collins, well, it’s not clear what their objective is.”

Jeffrey Sachs:

“comparing the House and Senate versions, the Senate version is clearly worse: more tax cuts, less infrastructure, and less in transfers to state and local governments. Immediate and sizable spending increases in the stimulus package should be directed to a few areas: significant support for our crisis-ridden state and local governments [just what got cut in the Senate], especially for health (Medicaid), education, and other urgent public services; income support (unemployment, anti-poverty including food stamps and child nutrition); health care coverage for the uninsured (as well as adequate Medicaid funding mentioned earlier); and a significant multi-year rollout of infrastructure of all sorts (roads, rail, other mass transit, ports, water, energy, broadband, etc.).”

James Galbraith:

“The behavior of the so-called bipartisan group has been outrageous. On the economics, they are pretending to know things they can’t possibly know: specifically, (a) how deep and serious the crisis actually is, and (b) what is ‘stimulus’ and what is not. The reality is, professional economists have no clear idea how bad things can get….. The cutbacks to state aid have every potential of being disastrous. What they really reflect is the indifference of people who represent places like Nebraska and Maine to what goes on in New York or California.”

Menzie Chinn:

“I don’t understand the direction of the movement toward cutting spending. Cutting the transfers to the states seems particularly ill-advised, as we have a good feeling that the propensity to spend out these funds will be high and relatively quick.”

Last group of quotes taken from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/09/the-800-billion-gamble-ec_n_165146.html

Louisville, Kentucky, 1937

Landmines don’t cut off legs, they merely facilitate an adjustment downward

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/02/09/lieberman-moderates-medal/

Congressional medal of honor downgrade

LIEBERMAN: And therefore, I think our three Republican colleagues — Olympia, Susan Collins, and Arlen Specter — are really the heroes in this for making a stimulus possible. […]

Again, I really can’t say enough about Olympia Snowe and the other two Republicans who really deserve the Congressional Medal of Honor on this one. They’ve put national interests ahead of what most members of their party were doing,

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/02/09/lieberman-moderates-medal/

Is there a Yiddish expression that would apply here?

2009 interview

http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/03/spinal-tap200903

Reminder

Beautiful, thus reason enough

Cutting defense budget

Stephen M. Walt at Foreign Policy:

Obama’s plan to cut the Department of Defense’s budget request by roughly ten percent is a step in the direction of a more sensible foreign and defense policy. But as one would expect, the proposal has some neoconservatives up in arms, insisting Robert Gates be given the full budget he requested and predicting the worst if he doesn’t get it. This view ignores the lessons of the past eight years and the developments of the past six months. And while they might be right that the U.S. military is over-extended, let’s not forget that it was the neoconservative policies that these same pundits promoted that got us into our present fix.

continue reading here:  http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/02/04/cutting_the_dods_budget_really_is_a_step_in_the_right_direction

h/t andrew sullivan

Grammy award, song of the year

h/t andrew sullivan

More yet on Obama’s stimulus bill and how we ought to think about it

Earlier notes/comments here: http://bernielatham.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/krugman-on-bipartisanship/

Michael Tomasky, of the Guardian UK writes:

Well, it’s already happened. Barely two weeks into the job and President Barack Obama has compromised fundamental principles, timorously caved in to Republicans and conservative Democrats in the Senate and lost control of his agenda.

Or … wait. Maybe it’s the case that, a mere two weeks into the job, President Obama has already changed the country’s direction in remarkable ways. He’s on the verge of a massive political victory when the Senate passes the stimulus package tomorrow, as expected, and the Republicans are apoplectic and divided and intellectually bankrupt.

Which is it? Friends, I usher you on a tour of the liberal mind.

OK, what I’m about to say isn’t true of everyone, of course. But there is a general thing: liberals are happy being unhappy. Or worrying. We’re (I very much include myself) big worriers. With reason: history teaches that the tide of change doesn’t always flow in our direction, especially in recent years. I know a lot of people who couldn’t quite believe that America could elect a man like Barack Obama, and still didn’t quite believe it after it happened.

…Well, today, I announce my emancipation from such habits. Goodbye to all that. The stimulus bill, imperfect as it is, does indeed represent an enormous political victory for Obama. For reasons tactical as well as substantive, liberals ought to declare victory and dance on the vast empty tundra that is the Republican present. 

continue reading here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/09/barack-obama-us-economy

There’s a hell of a lot of truth to what Tomasky is saying here about that “if it’s going good, we just aren’t properly recognizing the facts of things” mindset lots of us on the left can be victim too.   And, as Tomasky says, it’s not for no reason we might tend to worry.  And it isn’t just history.  A couple of decades ago, a longditudinal study of children led to a book titled “The Optimistic Child”.  The researchers found that children who naturally were predisposed to optimism were more likely to be successful in schooling and in life.  On the other hand, they found that the pessimistic children were more often right.

Consistency – a wimpish, academic value

“We can’t wait until the smoking gun becomes a mushroom cloud”

And here’s the Washington Times this morning on Obama repeating the concern of economists that we are in a very serious financial crisis:

 

From crisis to catastrophe. Off a cliff. Dark, darker, darkest. Mortal danger of absolute collapse. Armageddon.

President Obama and top Democrats on Capitol Hill are deploying these and other stark predictions of doom and gloom to push through their economic-stimulus package. In terms not heard in Washington since the late 1970s under President Jimmy Carter’s watch, the new president has sought to terrify Americans into supporting the $800 billion-plus bailout bill.   http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/09/ramped-up-obama-rhetoric-could-backfire/

h/t Washington Monthly

Quote of the day

“I’ve always thought … that some day the Republican party would become so insane that it would begin to frighten big business. That day may have arrived.”

See Steve Benen’s piece (from which this quote is excerpted) here: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/

Drat!

Ann Coulter.  What a goil.  Here’s a bit from her 2003 book Treason:

The myth of “McCarthyism” is the greatest Orwellian fraud of our times. Liberals are fanatical liars, then as now. The portrayal of Sen. Joe McCarthy as a wild-eyed demagogue destroying innocent lives is sheer liberal hobgoblinism.

That’s the least of what this individual has been up to over the last two decades http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Coulter

But now the creature might be in some bit of trouble:

Ann Coulter is being probed. Following our Jan. 11 column, Connecticut’s Elections Enforcement Commission is making a “thorough investigation” of whether the conservative pundit broke the law by voting in the Nutmeg State while living in New York City, according to a commission spokeswoman.

Officials are responding to a formal complaint filed by Coulterwatch.com blogger Dan Borchers. “For over 10 years, Ann Coulter has gotten away with illegal, immoral and unethical behavior, ranging from plagiarism to defamation, perjury to voter fraud,” claims the conservative Borchers. Coulter declined to comment, but in the past has branded Borchers a stalker. He says the FBI has determined he poses no threat.

http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/ny-daily-news-ann-coulter-being-inves

How cool is this?

From the Federation of American Scientists web site:

David W. Ogden, who has been nominated to be the next Deputy Attorney General, last week expressed strong support for government whistleblowers who help to expose corruption or malfeasance.

“I am a big believer in whistleblowers,” he said at his February 5 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, “and in the need to make sure that people feel comfortable coming forward to make complaints.”   

continue reading here: http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/02/big_believer.html

h/t TPM

Guantanamo inmates enjoy reduced risk of artery-clogging fats found in food

Right-Wing Senators Praised ‘Humane’ Conditions At Gitmo During 50-Detainee ‘Mass Hunger Strike’»

h/t TPM