Daily Archives: Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Today’s arse – Victor David Hanson

(The ‘arse’ is, I’ll remind you, someone who rather than being stupid is out to make you stupid through deceits and misrepresentations).

In a prior post, I pointed to a Bill Kristol column in the NY Times and how it demonstrated the difficulties conservative propagandists (those who attempt to appeal to a more highly educated and reflective audience than talk radio people like Limbaugh) have in attempting to demean and discredit Obama and how, in that column, his strategy was to attempt to paint Obama as a fancy talker/empty rhetoritician with no principle or policy which would stand as either unique or helpful in the face of those same tough “realities” which Bush/Cheney have faced.  In other words, Obama brings nothing of value to the Presidency – he is merely a wimpish and unmanly carbon-copy of those tigers, Bush and Cheney (and other such Republicans, Kristol and Hanson definitely included).  That post is here: http://bernielatham.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/todays-arse-liars-and-obscurantists-wishing-to-make-you-stupid/

In today’s NRO, Hanson heads up his version of this propaganda strategy with the title “Bush III”.  Cute, eh?  Not merely is Obama nothing new nor special but the Bush administration is suggested to be, in this framing, guiltless of extremism or failure (the “Bush Legacy Project” through the back door).  They did what they had to do, and so will Obama, and there’s no real difference except that Obama is a wimpier, empty-suit duplicate of what preceeded him.

Note as well the continuation of the complimentary strategy of implying that your hopes for anything different from Obama are merely “hysteria” (itself a noun that feminizes).  Read the short piece.  It’s a fine example of how this propaganda game is played by people like Kristol and Hanson.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDQ2OGExMjA2NDU3NWEwNmFkMjQyN2EzNDdjNDAxZDc=

Update:  And if you think Hanson is an arse, take a look at the piece posted this morning from Ferrigno.  Helpful tip for readers – it’s supposed to be satirical: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MWQ0YTk4YWY5ZDU5ZWE4ZGU1YTk0YWU3NzYyNzY4OTM=

Because pictures like this are pretty cool

Slide show here:  http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/homepage/hp1-13-09ww.jpg

Today’s notable headline – “That broad will never work in this town again!” category

Detainee Was Tortured, A Bush Official Confirms

The senior Pentagon official in the Bush administration’s system for prosecuting detainees said in a published interview that she had concluded that interrogators had tortured a Guantánamo detainee who has sometimes been described as “the 20th hijacker” in the 2001 terrorist attacks.

The public record of the Guantánamo interrogation of the detainee, Mohammed al-Qahtani, has long included what officials labeled abusive techniques, including exposure to extreme temperatures and isolation, but the Pentagon has resisted acknowledging that his treatment rose to the level of torture.

But the official, Susan J. Crawford, told Bob Woodward of The Washington Post that she had concluded that his treatment amounted to torture when she reviewed military charges against him last year. In May she decided that the case could not be referred for trial but provided no explanation at the time.

“His treatment met the legal definition of torture. And that’s why I did not refer the case” for prosecution, Ms. Crawford was quoted as saying in an article published in The Post on Wednesday.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/14/us/14gitmo.html?_r=1&hp

And who is Susn J. Crawford?

Crawford, a retired judge who served as general counsel for the Army during the Reagan administration and as Pentagon inspector general when Dick Cheney was secretary of defense…[and] a life-long Republican

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/13/AR2009011303372.html

We’ve long known, of course, that repeated claims from Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Pentagon officials, etc., that US policy under their administration did not countenance torture was a lie poorly hidden behind a legal strategy of defining ‘torture’ so narrowly that committing it was effectively impossible.

But the propaganda campaign surrounding this issue has not relied simply on redefining torture into a legally and logically meaningless term by Addington, Yoo and others.  This campaign, carried out through the numerous agencies and voices who function to propagandize for the RNC and movement, have argued and continue to argue that ”Of course the US doesn’t torture but even if it did, it woul be justified in protection of American citizens and as America hasn’t been attacked again, clearly the torture that the US has not done would be morally upstanding and proper even if it did it.”   Steadfast, clear-sighted, brave America at its best, perhaps.

We’ll watch now and see the various strategies that will be used to smear and discredit Ms. Crawford.  The Pentagon statement (quoted above) is boilerplate “Our own various thorough investigations cleared us already” and one has to simply expect it in the manner of a lawyer’s statement about his client’s innocence.