Daily Archives: Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Anyone here surprised?

 A former top Justice Department official made false statements to Congress and violated federal law in overseeing the agency’s civil rights division, investigators say.

The accusations against Bradley Schlozman, the former acting head of the civil rights division, are included in a new report by the department’s inspector general, Glenn Fine.

Tuesday’s report is the latest of several inquiries that found senior Justice Department officials violated civil service laws under the tenure of former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Gonzales has denied knowledge of the conduct by his deputies, but the series of reports paints a disturbing portrait of the nation’s top law enforcement agency being pulled in a sharply political direction during the Bush administration.

The report says Schlozman politicized and mistreated his staff and tried to punish agency employees he believed were too liberal. The report cited an e-mail in which Schlozman noted it had been awhile since he’d had to ”scream with a bloodcurdling cry at some commie.”

In the same 2003 missive, Schlozman used derogatory language to describe his pleasure in punishing career staffers, writing that ”bitchslapping a bunch of (division) attorneys really did get the blood pumping and was even enjoyable once in a while.”

more fun here: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/01/13/washington/AP-Justice-Civil-Rights.html?_r=1

Aggravated Dick Syndrome

 

Vice President Dick Cheney said that the prizes won by the New York Times for uncovering the Bush administration were “aggravating” to him, and cautioned the incoming administration on the lessons he’s learned in office.

Cheney said the domestic spying program “really worked” and provided valuable intelligence. “But then it became public,” Cheney said during an interview on conservative radio host Bill Bennett’s show. “The New York Times broke the story I think in December of ’05, won the Pulitzer for it, which always aggravated me.”

 

 

 

 

Aggravated him so much that he sent the DOJ after Risen in a classic example of using threats and intimidation to silence press criticism  (see here: http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/01/doj_still_hounding_wiretap_whistleblower.php 0

…Cheney cautioned that former Clinton administration officials, who he called “honorable,” who would rejoin the White House during the Obama administration should not assume they can pick up where they left off eight years ago.

“The fact is the world has changed in major ways since January of ’01 when we took over,” Cheney said. “And that break in service of some eight years I think they will find has been a period of time when the threat to the nation has changed in fairly dramatic ways.”

http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2009/01/13/cheney-nyt-pulitzers-for-spying-stories-aggravating/

Or, to put this another way, Cheney might have suggested that the Obama administration doesn’t make the sort of tragic ideological mistake Cheney and his people made which, quite arguably, resulted in a 9/11 plot succeeding where it might have been prevented had Cheney and his people not screwed up.  As Richard Clarke detailed in his book (and in his testimony before congress) the Bush administration came into office with a cold-war frame of reference and proceeded to ignore the warnings about bin Laden and his operation (including, of course, the famous “bin Laden planning to attack inside America” briefing).

Without comment

“Honest” and “decent” and “forthright”, that’s Bush alright

 I will miss his decency and directness and honesty. I will miss his fundamental goodness.

“[President Bush] has been forthright in accepting the consequences of his decisions. He is not a shifter of blame,”

Jay Nordlinger, senior editor National Review

h/t Andrew Sullivan

“Enhanced interrogation” – the Gestapo had a way with words

The phrase “Verschärfte Vernehmung” is German for “enhanced interrogation”. Other translations include “intensified interrogation” or “sharpened interrogation”. It’s a phrase that appears to have been concocted in 1937, to describe a form of torture that would leave no marks, and hence save the embarrassment pre-war Nazi officials were experiencing as their wounded torture victims ended up in court. The methods, as you can see above, are indistinguishable from those described as “enhanced interrogation techniques” by the president. As you can see from the Gestapo memo, moreover, the Nazis were adamant that their “enhanced interrogation techniques” would be carefully restricted and controlled, monitored by an elite professional staff, of the kind recommended by Charles Krauthammer, and strictly reserved for certain categories of prisoner. At least, that was the original plan.

For more on “Verscharfte Vernehmung”, continue reading here:   http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/05/verschfte_verne.html

Shut up shuttin’ up, both of you

Cheney, the silent sly one who’s words were mostly saved for the ears of the president, just told Sean Hannity today that he’s seriously considering writing a book.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/01/dick-cheney.html

Top 25 Bushisms

I started gathering Bush’s verbal slip-ups while covering his first presidential campaign. From the first one we published in Slate in October 1999—”The important question is, how many hands have I shaked?”—adding to the collection has been my main pleasure, perhaps my only pleasure, in watching the man.

Since then, I’ve collected—with help from Slate readers—more than 500 Bushisms. What follows is a list of my 25 favorites. There were many to choose from, but in my opinion, the greatest Bushism of all was delivered on Aug. 5, 2004, when the president declared: “Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.”
Laugh.  Cry.  Screech in fear.  Gape in amazement.  Kick a puppy in frustration.  Read them here:  http://www.slate.com/id/2208132/

Shut up shuttin’ up!

The White House said Monday that it has asked the networks for time Thursday night for President Bush to deliver a live, prime-time farewell address.

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/bush-to-give-farewell-address-thursday-2009-01-12.html

Today’s snark

Dana Milbank, on Bush’s exit speech defending his record:

By the time he finished, it was hard to imagine why only 23 percent of Americans are able to see the Bush years for the unqualified success that they are.

With seven days left until he surrenders power, Bush will have to do a heck of a sales job to convince the nation of this. Further complicating his last-minute legacy rehabilitation: Nobody seems to be paying attention. The White House had high expectations for yesterday’s final, historic news conference. “ONE CORRESPONDENT PER ORGANIZATION,” proclaimed the bulletin sent to reporters. “STANDING ROOM ONLY FOR NON-SEAT HOLDERS.” But when the appointed hour of 9:15 a.m. arrived, the last two rows in the seven-row briefing room were empty, and a press aide told White House interns to fill those seats.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/12/AR2009011203005.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

More 2010 senate retirements for Republicans (arthritis sets in)

 

Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 13, 2009; Page A06

 

A spate of retirement announcements by Senate Republicans this year have further complicated attempts by GOP strategists to begin rebuilding a party devastated by across-the-board losses in recent elections.

The latest departure news came yesterday, when Sen. George V. Voinovich of Ohio said he has decided not to seek a third term in 2010, citing a desire to “step back and spend the rest of our time with our children and grandchildren.” Voinovich joins Republican Sens. Sam Brownback (Kan.), Christopher S. Bond (Mo.) and Mel Martinez (Fla.) on the sidelines heading into the 2010 election. So far this year, no Democrats have announced plans to retire after the current Senate term.

The rapid pace of Republican retirement announcements has dispirited many in the party who thought the 2008 election, in which the party lost seven or eight seats (depending on the outcome of the Minnesota contest), marked the GOP’s nadir.

Sen. Lamar Alexander (Tenn.), the No. 3 Republican leader, said the decisions by Voinovich, Martinez and Bond hurt the party both politically and legislatively. “We’re losing three of our best players,” said Alexander, chairman of the Senate Republican Conference

“It makes an already tough situation even worse,” added Fred Davis, a Republican consultant who spearheaded advertising strategy for Sen. John McCain of Arizona in the 2008 presidential race.

Several factors have contributed to the large number of looming retirements. Age and length of service have played a role (Voinovich will be 74 on Election Day 2010, and Bond has spent the past three decades in public office), but the common element in each decision appears to be the difficult path facing Republicans if they hope to regain the majority.

Republicans control only 41 Senate seats and have 20 incumbents up for reelection in 2010, compared with 17 for the Democrats.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/12/AR2009011203010.html?nav=hcmodule