Daily Archives: Monday, January 5, 2009

Cluster bombs and white phosphorous

Update: I’ve spoken to a couple of ex-military folk and they’ve confirmed that pictures coming out of Gaza by AFP news service show white phosphorous rounds exploding over and setting fires in urban civilian areas. Meanwhile Haaretz has confirmed that cluster munitions are also being used by the IDF but says they’re being used over “open areas”. Gaza is a lot smaller than Rhode Island and cluster bombs have a pattern as big as a football field so your definition of “open areas” may vary from the IDF’s.

BBC slides here:  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/7810301.stm

 

But what the fuck does it matter when these creatures below are so much less than human

It’s a movement

People throw their shoes onto the street in front of the entrance to Downing Street in protest against the continued aerial bombardment of Gaza by Israel on January 3, 2009 in London, England.

News from Wasilla of the unsurprising sort

A Mat-Su drug investigator and the union representing Alaska State Troopers are alleging political meddling in the Sherry Johnston drug case, including a delay in serving the search warrant because of the November election.

Johnston is the mother of Levi Johnston, who became nationally known in September when Gov. Sarah Palin and her husband, Todd, announced their daughter, Bristol, was pregnant and he was the father. Palin was running for vice president while Sherry Johnston was under investigation.

more Wasilla yuk here: http://www.adn.com/front/story/641997.html

Chip off the old block

“You can go back to your, what do you call it, your Google,  and you figure out all that,”

 - president George H.W. Bush on the catastrophe of his son’s presidency.

h/t andrew sullivan

Andy Warhol, Steven Spielberg and Bianca Jagger hanging out

 

Andrew Sullivan posted this.  He adds the query, “Weed or coke?”   He’s puts his money on coke.

And yet more Franken

About a month ago, as it began to become apparent that Franken was taking the vote lead away from Coleman, National Review’s ditz princess Katherine Jane Lopez (known as K Lo to we folks on the left) wrote: 

I am now getting officially worried.

And as it turns out, perhaps K Lo is herself responsible for this horrid turn of events in Minnesota.  On May 25, 2004 she wrote, again at the National Review:

If The Radio Gig Doesn’t Work Out…  
…Al Franken can always run for Senate.  

h/t andrew sullivan

And speaking of Franken…today’s music

 

And this guy is now a Senator.  The universe is unfolding as it should.

h/t TPM

Franken win to be certified today

But Coleman is going to push this into the courts and Franken likely won’t be able to be seated.

Interesting tidbit from Todd Gitlin

In an earlier post referencing a Kristol column, I hypothesized that a noticeable change in tone/content might suggest that he was angling for a renewal of his short-term contract with the Times.  Gitlin catches this too. 

But there’s also a very interesting anecdote re Bill Safire and Likud at the tail end of Gitlin’s piece:

William Kristol’s penchant for certainty fails him this morning. Here are a few sentences from his NYT column, helpfully annotated by me:

 

“Israel could well succeed in Gaza….the Israeli leadership seems aware of the mistakes — political, strategic and military — it made in Lebanon. That doesn’t mean it won’t make them all over again.” “So far as one can tell, the Gaza operation seems to have been well-planned and is being methodically executed, in sharp contrast to the Lebanon incursion. Barak has also warned that the operation could be long and difficult, lowering expectations by contrast with the Israeli rhetoric of July 2006.”

 

 

The expectations are being lowered by Kristol now. The generous view is that he is belatedly mindful of some of his earlier enthusiasms. For example, on the subject of Iraq (h/t: David Corn):

 

“No one believes the inspections can work” (September 15, 2002).A war in Iraq “could have terrifically good effects throughout the Middle East” (September 18, 2002).

“We should not fool ourselves by believing that inspections could make any difference at all” (September 19, 2002).

 

On the risk of sectarian war after a US invasion of Iraq: “We talk here about Shiites and Sunnis as if they’ve never lived together. Most Arab countries have Shiites and Sunnis, and a lot of them live perfectly well together” (March 1, 2003).

“Very few wars in American history were prepared better or more thoroughly than this one by this president” (also March 1, 2003, not one of his better days)

 

Such tactical tentativeness in the neocon corner of the NYT is, to say the least, an interesting move at a moment when Israel’s carte blanche kneejerkers seem to find nothing problematic whatsoever in the Gaza overkill operation. In journalism’s land of cheap prophecy, even a neocon finds it necessary to cover his aspirations. Perhaps this is a tactic to win Kristol a second term as the Times’ most skippable columnist-of-the-week?

If so, it would be a far more interesting move for publisher Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., to substitute a right-wing columnist who is not blind to the amply demonstrated cracks in the neocon picture window.

Of course, it’s always possible that, instead, he’ll double down and replace Kristol with a different neocon hack, perhaps in nostalgia for the days when William Safire channeled Ariel Sharon directly, leading a top Times editor (Jewish, by the way, and not known for his strong political opinions one way or the other) to tell me at one point in the mid-’90s that Safire was “the Likud’s columnist.”

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/01/05/kristol_unclear/

Dead children in Gaza

Medical officials in the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip said Monday that Israeli attacks had killed 523 Palestinians, including 111 children. Israel has barred international news media from Gaza since the operation began, and the numbers couldn’t be verified.

If they’re confirmed, that would mark a dramatic spike in civilian casualties from the early days of Israeli airstrikes that primarily targeted Hamas-controlled police stations, the homes of Hamas leaders, government buildings and mosques that the Israeli military said were being used to store weapons.

Eleven members of one family, including five children, were killed in a northern Gaza City neighborhood early Monday morning after Israeli forces ordered them to leave their home, medical officials said. The family members said they’d sought safety in another apartment that was then hit by an Israeli strike.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/58981.html

Barney Frankisms

I think he [Obama] overestimates his ability to take people — particularly our colleagues on the Right — and sort of charm them into being nice. I know he talks about being post-partisan. But I’ve worked frankly with Newt Gingrich, Tom Delay, and the current Republican leadership. … When he talks about being post partisan, having seen these people and knowing what they would do in that situation, I suffer from post partisan depression.

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/12/22/post-partisan-depression/

What planet?

Fred Barnes continues the Bush Legacy Project over at The Weekly Standard.  It’s a head-shaker.  Here are the first then the last two sentences:

NOW WE KNOW how President Bush reads so many books.

He’s proud of what he achieved. And proud he should be.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/974rbirz.asp

Tea will never taste the same again

Waterford Wedgwood, the 250-year-old maker of luxury glassware and china, fell into administration today after failing to secure new funding.

The loss-making company, whose brands include Waterford crystal, Wedgwood and Royal Doulton fine bone china, Rosenthal porcelain and Spring premium cookware, ran out of time in its attempt to raise fresh capital. It said this morning that Deloitte will be appointed as receiver and administrator to its UK and Ireland operations.

continue reading here, if your eyes aren’t too watery: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jan/05/retail-recession

Politics and the economy

Republicans/conservatives are gearing up to to obstruct the Obama administration’s attempts to enact speedy and effective remedies for the economic crisis.   Paul Krugman writes on this today and he has it exactly right.

First, how dire might the situation be?

“If we don’t act swiftly and boldly,” declared President-elect Barack Obama in his latest weekly address, “we could see a much deeper economic downturn that could lead to double-digit unemployment.” If you ask me, he was understating the case.

The fact is that recent economic numbers have been terrifying, not just in the United States but around the world. Manufacturing, in particular, is plunging everywhere. Banks aren’t lending; businesses and consumers aren’t spending. Let’s not mince words: This looks an awful lot like the beginning of a second Great Depression.

And what can we expect from congressional and senate Republicans, from conservative activists and ideologues, and from the rightwing propaganda apparatus in response to the crisis and Dem moves to ameliorate it?

News reports say that Democrats hope to pass an economic plan with broad bipartisan support. Good luck with that.

In reality, the political posturing has already started, with Republican leaders setting up roadblocks to stimulus legislation while posing as the champions of careful Congressional deliberation — which is pretty rich considering their party’s behavior over the past eight years.

More broadly, after decades of declaring that government is the problem, not the solution, not to mention reviling both Keynesian economics and the New Deal, most Republicans aren’t going to accept the need for a big-spending, F.D.R.-type solution to the economic crisis.

We’ll see a continuing campaign to paint stimulus moves as a give-away of taxpayer monies, as pork barrel gifts to Dem constituencies, as covert attempts to graft ”socialism” into the economy and the country, and as undisciplined profligacy in managing government and financial matters.  Attendant with these claims will be another – that the situation we find ourselves in was caused by Dem/liberal policies and personnel in the past OR by some small ‘r’ republicans who fell into the trap of behaving like liberals/Democrats. 

Some of these people forwarding these notions likely believe them.  Others won’t care particularly whether there’s any truth in them at all, but rather will care only as regards their effectiveness as public relations or propaganda tools to inhibit any further increase in citizen opinion of and support for Democratic or liberal politicians and policies.  The primary desire here for the ideologues is to prevent evil, corrupt, wrong-headed liberalism or progressivism from seducing Americans once again (as they believe happened with the New Deal and during the Sixties) and for the propagandist types the primary desire is to – by any means – regain ground lost in the last two elections.

As more than a few of them have already stated (I’ve noted this earlier here) a fundamental strategy on-going for the Republicans/conservatives is to differentiate their party/movement in the public mind.  Nothing wrong with that, in an of itself, of course.  It’s how it is done that matters.  If you are in some contest with one other person, you could promote your positives or you could make accusations and suggestions that the other fellow is a child molester or you could bash the other contestant across her shins with a steel rod as she steps onto the ice.    The latter mode is the one commonly adopted by Republicans and conservatives since at least the period of Nixon.  If we are not as yet disabused of the romanticism that these people care much at all about the facts, about honesty, and about citizens’ health and well-being, then we are dull indeed.

All of the above is readily predictable and easily observable if one attends to what these people are saying and doing.  I will set this post up as the first of an on-going series on the same issue and update regularly to demonstrate the strategies and statements and inititatives they will use in attempting to accomplish their goals.