Daily Archives: Thursday, December 18, 2008

James Risen on executive power under Bush

New York Times Pulitzer winner James Risen in interview…

http://newsproject.org/

Less delightful…american mercenary companies

http://fora.tv/2008/11/20/Steve_Fainaru_In_the_Company_of_Americas_Mercenaries

Terrific Trillin

Calvin Trillin reflects on insulting Henry Kissinger (“I suppose you are wondering why I referred to you as a dork-robot?”) and others

http://fora.tv/2008/12/05/Calvin_Trillin_Reflects_on_Insulting_Henry_Kissinger

Rick Warren

Rick Warren and the Prop 8 Revolt

I think it’s safe to say that no decision by Barack Obama since his vote for FISA legislation much earlier this year has aroused as much authentic anger among progressives as his invitation to evangelical superstar Rick Warren to provide the invocation at his inauguration next month.

http://www.thedemocraticstrategist.org/

This decision is making a lot of people unhappy.  With justification.  We’ll see how it works out.

Misinformer of the Year

Congratulations Sean Hannity

http://mediamatters.org/items/200812170007?f=h_top

August 25, Hannity and Combes broadcast, Juan Williams responds to a statement from Hannity, “I agree but I can’t believe you’re saying this.  You demonized Hillary.”  Hannity replied, “That’s my job…I led the ‘Stop Hillary Express.’  By the way, now it’s the “Stop Obama Express”.

That is exactly his job description.  And he is but one of many in the rightwing media machine whose daily tasks have the identical job description.

Today’s other music

Bush Legacy and Library of Lies

Here’s a delightful bit of  propagandist art on the wall of the Bush library…

 

It’s an entirely reasonable juxtaposition of images of course, as Martin Luther King was a rich spoiled brat white kid with a life of incredible wealth and connections to the american power structure who was responsible for starting a war which killed and maimed hundreds of thousands and who constantly lied to his fellow citizens. 

Really quite pathetic, isn’t it? 

Image from here… http://thinkprogress.org/2008/12/11/bush-mlk/

Frank Gaffney reaches pinnacle of dispicablehood

Neoconservative and signatory to the Project For A New American Century, Gaffney said last evening in an interview with Chris Matthews:

MATTHEWS: You guys sold the war as a nuclear threat to the United States. You sold every trick you could to get us into this war. And now you’re backpedaling. And I do find it astounding….four thousand people are dead because of the way you feel and, Frank Gaffney, you’re wrong about this.

GAFFNEY: It is regrettable that they had to die, but I believe they did have to die. The danger was inaction could have resulted in the death of a great many more Americans than 4,000. And that’s the reason I’m still delighted that we did what we did.

Gaffney is delighted.

 

more on Gaffney here… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Gaffney

Today’s Christmas snark

courtesy of Andrew Sullivan

Pure, jaw-dropping yule-tide puke-fest from Sonny and Cher:

Growing chorus?

Demands for war crimes prosecutions are now growing in the mainstream

…It’s almost as though everyone’s nose is now being rubbed in all of this:  now that the culpability of our highest government officials is no longer hidden, but is increasingly all out in the open, who can still defend the notion that they should remain immune from consequences for their patent lawbreaking?  As Law Professor Jonathan Turley said several weeks ago on The Rachel Maddow Show:  “It’s the indictment of all of us if we walk away from a clear war crime.”  And this week, Turley pointed out to Keith Olbermann that “ultimately it will depend on citizens, and whether they will remain silent in the face of a crime that has been committed in plain view. . . . It is equally immoral to stand silent in the face of a war crime and do nothing.”

That recognition, finally, seems to be spreading — beyond the handful of blogs, civil liberties organizations and activists who have long been trumpeting the need for this accountability.  The New York Times Editorial Page today has a lengthy, scathing decree demanding prosecutions:  “It would be irresponsible for the nation and a new administration to ignore what has happened . . . . A prosecutor should be appointed to consider criminal charges against top officials at the Pentagon and others involved in planning the abuse.”  Today, Politico — of all places — is hosting a forum which asks:  ”Should the DOJ consider prosecuting Bush administration officials for detainee abuse as the NYT and others have urged?”  Even Chris Matthews and Chris Hitchens yesterday entertained (albeit incoherently and apologetically) the proposition that top Bush officials committed war crimes.

Perhaps most notably of all — and illustrating the importance of finally having someone like Rachel Maddow occupy such a prominent place in an establishment media venue — Democratic Sen. Carl Levin, one of the Senate’s most restrained, influential and Serious members, was prodded by Maddow last night into going about as far as someone like him could be expected to go, acknowledging the necessity of appointing a Prosecutor to investigate top Bush officials for the war crimes they committed and to determine if prosecutions are warranted…

continue reading here… http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/12/18/prosecutions/

 

Update:  Milan Markovic writes on John Yoo’s legal culpability in this mess… http://www.slate.com/id/2206518/

drat again

…a Quinnipiac University poll released today suggests that Connecticut’s staunchly Democratic voters haven’t forgotten, nor forgiven, Lieberman for failing to back Obama.

According to the poll, Lieberman’s approval rating dropped to its lowest mark ever, a scant 38 percent, with 54 percent of those polled disapproving of his job performance. This is down from the 46 percent approval rating he had in July.

In the article accompanying the poll, Douglas Schwartz, the Quinnipiac University poll director, said, “Sen. Joseph Lieberman appears to be paying a high price for his embrace of Sen. John McCain in the presidential race. This is the highest disapproval rating in any Quinnipiac University poll in any state for a sitting U.S. Senator — except for New Jersey’s Robert Torricelli, just before he resigned in 2002. Among those who say they voted for Sen. Lieberman in 2006

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/

Paul Weyrich dies

One usually resists speaking negatively about the recently deceased but this guy changed the face of american conservatism for much the worse.  Norquist’s comments (bolded) are not exaggerated as regards scope and magnitude.

Paul M. Weyrich, 66, who helped found the Heritage Foundation and at one time was one of Washington’s most visible conservatives, died this morning. At his death, he was president and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation.

Heritage announced this morning: “Paul M. Weyrich, chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation and first president of The Heritage Foundation, died this morning around 1 a.m. He was 66 years old. Weyrich was a good friend to many of us at Heritage, a true leader and a man of unbending principle. He won Heritage’s prestigious Clare Boothe Luce Award in 2005. Weyrich will be deeply missed. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family, including son Steve, who currently works at Heritage.”

Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform wrote this tribute: “Paul Weyrich created institutions and networks that incubated new and old powerful policies and strategies to advance liberty. … He brought leaders of various freedom impulses together. Most of the successes of the Conservative movement since the 1970s flowed from structures, organizations, and coalitions he started, created or nurtured. Paul also lived a balanced life with work, family and his faith. We will miss his puns and wisdom and hard work.”

Kathryn Jean Lopez of National Review Online, who had the first word of his passing, called Weyrich “a Washington conservative institution” and “a patriot who lived a long life serving his nation.”

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16702.html

and the wiki entry on him… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Weyrich

update:  an interesting account from Ed Kilgore…

Paul Weyrich, the legendary conservative institution-builder and avatar of what was once, in his heydey, called the New Right, died yesterday after a long illness.

I’m not the one to assess Weyrich’s career, and thus recommend Marc Ambider’s brisk summary of his triumphs back in the day and his long, ornery decline.

I can offer one personal anecdote that offers some insight into the man’s personality. One of his less-successful projects was a cable network, National Empowerment Television (later America’s Voice), that represented something of an earnestly amateurish dry run for Fox News. Virtually all the shows on NET featured call-ins, and viewers were about as rabidly conservative as you can get. I once appeared as a Token Democrat on Weyrich’s own show, back when I’d accept just about any media opportunity this side of the Sunrise Farm Report. The first caller made a snarky remark about my (then) long hair, and Weyrich proceeded to use much of the balance of the show lecturing his viewers about civility.

That was fairly typical of the man. He spent a good part of his long career appealing to and often speaking for extremists, but he didn’t much like his “friends” any more than his enemies. He was undoubtedly one of the Founding Fathers of the Cultural Right; he reportedly is the one who suggested the monniker “Moral Majority” to Jerry Falwell for his first-generation Christian Right group. But in every personal respect, Weyrich was wildly different from the slick, weasily hacks like Ralph Reed and Tony Perkins who eventually displaced him as the public faces of his own movement.

Paul Weyrich didn’t have a phony bone in his body. And though he very productively served causes I abhor for many decades, I have to say that his old-school style, which he pursued to the point of self-marginalizing eccentricity, is a trait that tradition-honoring conservatives ought to respect and miss every time they turn on Fox to watch and hear the automatons drone.

http://www.thedemocraticstrategist.org/

Drat

Trust in GOP Reaches Record Low

Just 23 percent in a new Washington Post-ABC News poll said they trust Republicans more than Democrats to handle the main problems facing the nation, the lowest level reached by either party in surveys dating back to 1982.

A majority, 56 percent, trust the Democrats to handle the nation’s top issues over the next few years, also a record in Post-ABC polling. But the GOP’s recent losses have not translated into big Democratic gains, instead the proportion who trust neither party has climbed to 15 percent.

Trust in the GOP has fallen nine points since May, driven by a 19-point decline among conservatives. Nearly one in five in that group said they trust neither party.

Among independents, nearly twice as many said they trust neither party to cope with the nation’s problems than trust Republicans – 28 percent to 17 percent. Nearly half – 46 percent – have more confidence in the Democrats, down seven points since May.

Republicans last held a significant advantage on this question in 2002.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/behind-the-numbers/2008/12/trust_in_gop_reaches_record_lo.html?wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter