To those who drop by hoping for more (and who wouldn’t be?)… I’m just very busy these days with an enterprise my wife and I began last June.
My apologies. With luck, the economy will recover though this might possibly entail the beginning of the End of Days when Republicans are lifted up into His arms and the rest of us left below can then actually formulate and engage rational policies.
Haven’t quite figured out why this image produces some weird responses in me. Partly, it seems connected to a nightmarish perception of the present. A bad wind steers Gulliver to the shores of Consumdingnag but it’s real.
Nate Silver, the young polling whiz of FiveThirtyEight, just received an email from John Lofton. Some months back, Lofton posted here and the two of us had a grand time (put his name in the search box on the right – not the upper one).
For this IDF Chief Rabbi, God’s version of the Nuremburg war crimes trials has those who hestitate to drop cluster bombs on innocents as the ungodly damned.
Auto purchase alert: if you are down in Texas and see a blue/white 2 million dollar Veyron listed in the Auto Trader at a surprisingly low price, check for rust and rotting dove-scrotum leather upholstery…
The Weekly Standard crowd do one of those way-cool and way-logically-compelling Glenn Beck this-links-to-this charts…
Conservatives with intellectual integrity. We don’t need a lot of fingers to count them up presently. Bruce Bartlett is one.
I don’t mean to imply that Europeanization is unambiguously good; only that it’s not unambiguously bad, as virtually all conservatives believe. There are many ways I think we could learn from the Europeans and they from us. One way we can learn from them is how to have a tax system that raises considerably more revenue as a share of the economy than ours does without killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.
At a minimum, I think it’s safe to say that Hayek was wrong about the inevitability of totalitarianism arising from growth in the size of government. The collapse of communism is proof enough of that.
Andrew Sullivan gets Bill Kristol right but could add that teaching people to hate serves the financial interests of the military/corporate complex very well indeed.
If you happened to see Wolf Blitzer’s interview with the lawyer defending the accused shooter at Ft. Hood, you may have wondered how such a pompous and really rather stupid man got and maintains his media postion. Here’s Michael Tomasky on the interview.
The neoconservative camp, even moreso than the typical conservative, continues to pump up the idea that Russia is a big bad dangerous creature in need of aggressive military opposition. During the Reagan era, these people were influential and that influence continued on under Bush 2 where, concentrating on this ‘issue’, they disregarded the threats that Richard Clarke and others advised would come from al qaeda. They are still at it. Anti-communism was the ideological center of seventies conservatism and neoconservatism and it’s no easy thing to have your center disappear. Of course, all of this makes rather more sense when one links together this militarist zest and the huge amounts of corporate money which arise from US militarism.
Months ago the president of CNN/U.S., Jonathan Klein, offered a choice to Lou Dobbs, the channel’s most outspoken anchor. Mr. Dobbs could vent his opinions on radio and anchor an objective newscast on television, or he could leave CNN.
Gordon Brown has “the most enormous personal regard” for media magnate Rupert Murdoch, Downing Street said today amid reports that the prime minister telephoned him directly to complain about the Sun’s criticism of his government’s handling of the war in Afghanistan.
The pair spoke on Tuesday at the height of a row over Brown’s misspelling of a dead soldier’s name in a handwritten letter of condolence to the victim’s grieving mother Jacqui Janes, published by the newspaper alongside her accusations of disrespect.
Rupert Murdoch’s flagship American tabloid newspaper, the New YorkPost, has been accused of an extraordinary litany of racist and sexist behaviour by a former senior editor who is claiming discrimination in her sacking in September.
Sandra Guzman has filed a discrimination lawsuit in the New York courts against Murdoch’s media empire, News Corporation, the New York Postand its editor-in-chief Col Allan. She claims that behind the Post’s famously pointed and cheeky headlines lies a “hostile work environment where female employees and employees of colour have been subjected to pervasive and systematic discrimination and/or unlawful harassment based on their gender”…
She also claims the Obama cartoon was part of a concerted effort by the paper’s management to undermine America’s first black president. The lawsuit alleges that Charles Hurt, the Post’s Washington bureau chief, once told her that the goal was “to destroy Barack Obama. We don’t want him to succeed.”
The Jerusalem District Prosecutor’s Office on Thursday charged alleged Jewish terrorist Yaakov (Jack) Teitel with two murders, three attempted murders and other acts of violence.
“It was a pleasure and an honor to serve my God,” said Teitel at the Jerusalem courthouse. “I have no regret and no doubt that God is pleased.”
Speaking at a luncheon for a Midland County Republican Women’s group, Perry said that “this is an administration hell-bent toward taking American towards a socialist country. And we all don’t need to be afraid to say that because that’s what it is.”
Perry praised the tea party movement to the Republican activists in attendance, crediting the grassroots groups with discouraging some Democrats in Washington from pushing for a public option in the health care bill.
One afternoon, chatting with one of my Sociology profs in her office, I was handed an idea which has proved to be a source of continuing illumination into all the ways in which we humans can be seen to imagine reality.
That idea, from the fertile mind of this amazing man, was that when we consider abstract notions, we begin by using or assuming a pair of binary opposites – good/evil, black/white, etc. We impose that conceptual framing or architecture over what we are trying to understand or make sense of. It may not be, indeed probably rarely ever is, an accurate reflection of the real world but using this simplistic conceptual framework allows us to begin thinking about whatever the abstract subject is.
One interesting aspect to consider here is how some people in certain circumstances seem to be unable to formulate a more nuanced or complicated conceptual mapping (shades of grey, to use the cliche) but stand firm in their insistence/certainty that the simplistic framing of binary or polar opposities represents the most valuable and fundamental truth of things, a ‘truth’ which is in danger of being lost if one allows nuance and complexity. These are the humans that scare me.
Is the John Hagee/Joe Lieberman alliance of right-wing American Jews and evangelical Christians — based on the premise that God demands that all land, including the West Bank and Gaza, be possessed by Jews — devoted to the advancement of “the Western way of reason”? Is the platform of the Texas GOP — which calls for the criminalization of all sex between gay adults; the denial of all custody rights to gay people, even over their own children; the teaching of creationism in all public schools; and the denial of medical care to prisoners other than those who can pay for it — an example of “the Western way of reason”? How about the Catholic Church’s proselytizing against birth control in areas of the world drowning in poverty, AIDS and overpopulation? Are torture, Guantanamo, Bagram, disappearing people, immunizing war criminals and multiple decade-long wars shining examples of “the Western way of reason”? How about invading a country on totally false pretenses, shattering and destroying it, and causing the deaths of at least 100,000 human beings?
Hey – look over there. Muslims. They’re waging war on reason and taking over. We have to unite to stop them. Glenn Greenwald
Lynn Vincent made headlines when she was selected as the ghostwriter for Sarah Palin’s soon-to-be-bestselling memoir, “Going Rogue.” As an editor at the Christian World magazine, Vincent has railed against abortion rights, gay marriage and the theory of evolution. She is also the coauthor of the book “Donkey Cons,” which purports to prove, among other claims, “how Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, and John F. Kennedy were elected with the help of the mob.” Her coauthor on that book, Robert Stacey McCain (no relation to John McCain) has spoken outagainst interracial marriage.
As I suggested below, the RNC types may be setting up Liz Cheney for a political run at the presidency or, perhaps more likely, the VP slot. It’s a bit difficult to game out what these incredible jerks are up to.
As announced recently, Cheney is being pushed forward as one of the heads (along with Bill Kristol) of “Keep America Safe”. Maureen Dowd writes:
Kristol joked to Politico’s Ben Smith that the venture might serve as a launching pad for Liz to run for office. (A Senate bid from Virginia, where she lives, or Wyoming, which she still calls home?)
That raises the terrifying specter that some day we could see a Palin-Cheney ticket, promoted by Kristol.
Sarah would bring her content-free crackle and gut instincts; Liz would bring facts and figures distorted by ideology. Pretty soon, we’re pre-emptively invading Iran and the good times are rolling all over again.
We’ll recall that one of the valid and biting arguments against George W Bush running for the presidency was that he was a mental lightweight and that the addition of Dick Cheney to the ticket (Cheney was in charge of choosing a VP and chose himself) added “gravitas”. This notion was all the rage in punditry at the time. And (with the help of the Supreme Court) it worked. An immature, ex-alcoholic, anti-intellectual with a C average gained the position of President and did the posturing while Cheney pretty much ran the show.